Tuesday, 20 October 2015

A-3, Enlightenment Philosophy

ASSIGNMENT

“ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY”


MITHYA A
LCL051511



INTRODUCTION

Unique but popular collective ideas are always the characteristic of every society whether past or present. Literature also contributes to the change in society and perceive people’s mind. In English specific year span constitutes the changes in literature. Such a way here the topic of discussion is “Enlightenment philosophy” along with its previous period, neoclassical age and later period romantic age. Enlightenment is an eighteenth century movement in arts and science which gives importance to reason. So it is break up from tradition and conventions, people began to think beyond religion. It is positive sign that rational thinking dominated the age.
The major features of Enlightenment philosophy were rationalism, empiricism which is based on experience, pragmatism or practical thinking and utilitarianism. Enlightenment was freeing humanity from its earlier belief on mere authority and unexamined tradition. Enlightenment period is also known as “age of reason” even though there is different views regarding reason among various thinkers. In political and economic contexts enlightenment was the rise of liberalism and the French revolution of 1789, which fostered the discarding the power of king and a shift to bourgeoisie or middle class. Liberalism was the free rational economy protected by technology and science.
            The idea of rationalism is not new to eighteenth century, because Plato and Aristotle too advocated reasoning to acknowledge universal truths. Enlightenment was not a movement restricted to England but French and Dutch thinkers also contributed to the period. René Descartes, a French philosopher put forward the philosophy of rationalism. His concept of “I think, therefore, I am” is popular and influential. There are many other influential thinkers in enlightenment, like Locke, Hume, Diderot, Voltaire etc.
 Before detailing the characteristics of enlightenment, it is necessary to understand what happened in early period. The early period of enlightenment was, Neoclassic. The Neoclassical period constitutes three major phases; Restoration or the age of Dryden, next is Augustan age, the major figure of this period was Pope, and the last phase is Age of Sensibility or Age of Johnson. But it does not mean that in each phase only one literary figure is overruled. There was also many other important writers and thinkers. The authors of these period were exhibited a strong traditionalism which lacked innovation and over emphasis on classical writers. Actually the term “neoclassic” shows that it was revival of classical. The classical writers were the established models in all the major literary genres. The period considered literature as an art, or a set of skills which was perfected by long study and practice. They upheld that human beings are the primary subject matter of the major forms of literature because they are the integral part of social organization.  Human being is the centre of literary works. Two of the central concepts of neoclassical literary theory were “imitation” and “nature” which were intimately related. Imitation implies of the external world and human action and the nature implies collective idea like human nature or harmonious and hierarchical order of the universe etc.
Later as a response to neoclassical and enlightenment emerged the Romantic period. So it is clear that evolution of each period is a kind of response to the former period. Whether enlightenment is a reply to the negatives of neoclassic age or romantic age as a corrective to enlightenment, the process of changes in the society and people goes on. A social and political change reflects in the intellectual of people as a result it produced in the literature as well.



NEOCLASSICAL PERIOD
The neoclassical age begins in the early seventeenth century, it ends around 1785. The specific year span is not possible because, sometimes the enlightenment period over laps neoclassical age. It is impossible to give a definition to the period, it may be conflicting. The salient features of neoclassical writings constitute the overall idea of the period. As mentioned earlier, neoclassic was the ‘new’ classic. The thinkers of this period advocated ancient writers of Greece and Rome and their excellence. Neoclassic in a kind, devoted to slavish imitation of the classics. Neoclassicist was the heirs of Renaissance humanists. They implied the separation of prose from poetry. The writers’ indebted to classical age, they emphasized classical values such as objectivity, impersonality, rationality, decorum, balance, harmony, proportion and moderation. Like enlightenment thinkers, neoclassicists also preached the ideals of ‘reason’ but it is different, enlightenment thinkers believed in coercive and oppressive force constituted reason. The neoclassicists believed reason of the classical philosophers.
                        Neoclassicism followed ‘standardization’ in all spheres, but it is impossible to keep strict rules and regulations in creative art. It is also true in that period creativity is somewhat related to the past legacy. The neoclassicists believed that Homer and Vergil already discovered and expressed fundamental laws of nature. The modern writers were obliged to imitate these set of ideas paved by the past. If they did so they can create excellent works, invention was also allowed as a modification of past models. Neo classical criticism first originated in France and then spread to other parts of Europe notably in England. The major figures of French neoclassicism were Corneille, Racine, Moliere and    La Fontaine.  

Pierre Corneille (1606-1684)
Pierre Corneille was the founding figure of neoclassicism in France. His important literary criticism was Trois Discourse sur le Poeme Dramatique (Three Discourse on Dramatic Poetry, 1660). He was criticized for violating three unities in his drama Le Cid, and also Aristotlian perception of probability and necessity and thereby undermined morally didactic function of drama. Corneille agrees with Aristotle’s view but he took liberal interpretation of Aristotle’s three unities and didacticism. Corneille explains that it is easy for critics to be strict in their censure; but if they themselves practice it they will find difficulty behind it. Corneille’s view is that; make ancient rules agree with modern pleasures. He perceives classical views in favour of modern audience. He had the opinion that literature is not merely meant for instruction, but for entertainment too.
                        In England, neoclassicism was inspired by the French example. It was also reaction against French neoclassicism. Neoclassical criticism in England was not so systematic; many saw it as integral part of political state. The major figures of English neoclassicism were Dryden, Pope, Aphra Behn, Samuel Johnson etc.

John Dryden (1631-1700)
Dryden was a nationalist writer. He popularized English nationalist feeling in his writings. Language and literature used for inspiring English people. Dryden also defended English drama against some of the French critics; he advocated that English should have a theory instead of following French dramatic theory. Samuel Johnson termed Dryden “the father of English criticism”. Like Corneille, Dryden attempted to strike a compromise between the claims of ancient authority and the needs of the modern writer. Dryden with his character Neander, supports the observation of Corneille that anyone with actual experience of the stage will see how constraining the classical rules are.
Dryden was against the strict distinction between genres. His text might be viewed as expressing a status of transition between neoclassicism and romanticism. If Dryden is neoclassical, it is in the sense that he acknowledges the classics as having furnished archetypes of drama; but modern writers, he says, are at liberty to create their own literary traditions. Dryden considers poetry as a rational activity with ethical and epistemological responsibility.

Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
Pope’s An Essay on Criticism contains the clearest statement of neoclassical principles in any language. An Essay on Criticism is written in verse. Pope here not only delineates the scope and nature of good literary criticism, but redefines classical virtues in terms of ‘nature’ and ‘wit’ as necessary to both poetry and criticism. Pope had the opinion that best poetry and the best criticism are divinely inspired. He put forward guidelines for a critic, he says, first a critic should recognize overall unity of a work. A critic should also partial in analyzing a work. Finally a critic needs to possess a moral sensibility ad sense of balance. It is clear that these qualities of a good critic are primarily attributes of humanity or moral sensibility rather than aesthetic qualities. Indeed the only specifically aesthetic quality mentioned here is ‘taste’. Pope equates the classical literary and critical traditions with nature, and to sketch a redefined outline f literary history from classical to his own era. Pope insists that rues of nature were merely discovered, not invented by the ancients.

Aphra Behn (1640-1689)
Aphra Behn was one of the founders of English novel. Her novel Oroonko was the first novel against slavery. She was one of the commercial playwrights, because of her circumstances. Aphra Behn sees herself as masculine part of her writing. Her experience as a female playwright exposed her to the numerous obstacles faced by woman in this profession, resulting in her highly unorthodox and controversial views about drama. Corneille appeal to experience rather than classical rules, but Behn appeal to experience, especially female experience. She takes drama basically as a tool of entertainment. Behn was criticized by her male contemporaries. She replies these criticism by saying that if women gets the same education as men, are just as capable of acquiring knowledge and in many capacities as men.  She points out that many works of poetry have treated the subject of women in an indecent fashion, but the offense is overlooked because man wrote them.
                                    Behn’s originality lies as much in the way she speaks; her texts adopt a tone and a style unprecedented in the history of literary criticism.  Behn advocate that virtues of good judgment, critical reading and thinking should be looked beyond the pale of masculine learning and the conventional male literary establishment. She speaks above from these establishments and discards male assumptions about women writers. She says woman’s use the categories of common sense and reason.



Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
Samuel Johnson is renowned for his two -volume Dictionary of the English Language. His most famous poem is The Vanity of Human Wishes, a speculation on the emptiness of worldly pursuits. He also wrote drama and fictional work, The History of Rasselas and essays in periodicals. In his fictional work The History of Rasselas one of the character Imlac’s statements is considered as the summary of neoclassical principles. The business of the poet, says Imlac, is to examine, not the individual, but the species; to remark general properties and large appearances…He is to exhibit in his portraits of nature such prominent and striking features, as recall the original to every mind. Johnson’s classical commitment to reason, truth and probability was complemented by his equally classical insistence on the moral function of literature. Johnson acknowledges that the greatest excellency of art is to imitate nature, but which are most proper for imitation. Johnson was also commented about Shakespeare and his works.  He reaffirms the excellence of Shakespeare’s works and called Shakespeare as the poet of nature.


THE ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY
The common element of enlightenment was a trust in universal and uniform reason as adequate to solve the crucial problems, this rationalism was necessary to overcome darkness of superstition. Enlightenment philosophy is flourished in all the fields like language, literature, art, religion, and political theory.  The enlightenment thinkers considered themselves as initiating an era free from feudal caprice, political absolutism and religious intolerance. The main themes of enlightenment philosophy continued in our present society too. The seminal figures of enlightenment philosophy were Bacon, Descartes, and Spinoza.  The Enlightenment was, at its center, a celebration of ideas – ideas about what the human mind was capable of, and what could be achieved through deliberate action and scientific methodology. Many of the new, enlightened ideas were political in nature. Intellectuals began to consider the possibility that freedom and democracy were the fundamental rights of all people, not gifts bestowed upon them by beneficent monarchs or popes. The Enlightenment was believed to be the realization of the tools and strategies necessary to achieve that potential. The Renaissance was the seed, while the Enlightenment was the blossom. John Locke was the influential figure in enlightenment philosophy. Actually his theory of empiricism bridges a connection between enlightenment philosophy and literary criticism.
                                    The essential beliefs and convictions of Enlightenment thinkers were by and large committed to writing, thus a fairly accurate sketch of the eighteenth century mind is available to historians working in this century. Medieval Christian philosophy acknowledged t that reason was a necessary component of a proper spiritual disposition, but it was only one element needed to be balanced by faith and revelation. What was novel to the enlightenment was its insistence on reason a as the primary faculty through which we could acquire knowledge. The faith of the Enlightenment is that the process of enlightenment, of becoming progressively self-directed in thought and action through the awakening of one's intellectual powers, leads ultimately to a better, more fulfilled human existence. Enlightenment philosophy tends to stand in tension with established religion, insofar as the release from self-incurred immaturity in this age, daring to think for oneself, awakening one's intellectual powers, generally requires opposing the role of established religion in directing thought and action.
                        Enlightenment thinkers like Locke, Addison, Vico, and Mary Wollstonecraft put forward their new ideas to popularize the period, some of them philosophically contributed to the period, whereas some of them protested against the pre-enlightenment period. The theories like feminism had a root in enlightenment age. Enlightenment is the process of undertaking to think for one self, to employ and rely on one's own intellectual capacities in determining what to believe and how to act. Enlightenment philosophers from across the geographical and temporal spectrum tend to have a great deal of confidence in humanity's intellectual powers, both to achieve systematic knowledge of nature and to serve as an authoritative guide in practical life. So in later period also these thinkers were influential. Apart from renaissance period quest for scientific knowledge predominated in the enlightenment period too.  Let us discuss about the major enlightenment figures, such as John Locke, Joseph Addison etc.

John Locke (1632-1704)
John Locke is the founding father of British Empiricism, and his thought is often characterized by tolerance, moderation and common sense. Locke’s philosophy is still having a position in our mind, empiricism or arriving at truth through sensations is the principle idea of Locke, we too participating in judgment of a thing through experience. Locke suggested that use of language in a precise way will reduce unnecessary confusion in our concepts. He opines that language is closely connected with thought process so the correct use of language is necessary.  Locke revives the age-old antagonism between philosophy and poetry. He sees poetry as the realm of imagination where as philosophy was the absolute and clear judgment and urge to further knowledge. The former, that is poetry, creates confusion and conflation, while the latter, philosophy, tended towards clarity. He goes on detailing the difference between poetry and philosophy, saying one is figurative language and other is the language of reality etc. Locke defines language as a “instrument of knowledge” so here the emphasis on language shows Locke’s concern about language. He says that the imperfection of words lies in the uncertainty of what they signify. 
                                                Locke had an opinion that a standardized dictionary of all language will clear all controversies of the period. Locke’s voice is perhaps the most pronounced sign of the bourgeois refashioning of language into a utilitarian instrument. Locke was more conscious about language and its criticism. Locke is some extent similar in the views of Plato. He emphasizes that ‘general’ and ‘universal’ do not belong to the real existence or things in themselves but it is merely the creation of human mind. Locke denies the idea of real essence; he says everything is purely verbal essence or existed in words. For Locke, nature represents everything through our thought process we create assumptions and ultimately expresses through the medium of language.

Joseph Addison (1672-1719)
Joseph Addison with his friend Richard Steele authored a series of article in the periodicals The Tattler and The Spectator. Like Plato, Addison is concerned with how a literary work affects its reader, though unlike Plato he is less concerned with the moral effect of a poem, than with its aesthetic effect; he is interested more in how a poem ‘delights’ than in how, or what, it ‘instructs’. Following the mental philosophy of John Locke, Addison describes two kinds of pleasure in imagination. Primary pleasure comes from the immediate experience of objects through sensory perception; secondary pleasure comes from the experience of ideas, from the presentation of objects (in words or picture) when those objects are not present. He distinguishes the powers of the imagination from the powers of reason, noting that while reason investigates the cause of things, imagination is content with experiencing them, either directly or through representations. Addison agrees with Sidney and Bacon that art is not just an imitation of nature, but an improvement on or completion of it.
                                    In the periodicals Steele and Addison addresses many issues of that period. The topics of their writing were nature tragedy, wit, genius, the sublime, and the imagination. Steele referred to his age as a corrupt age, devoted to luxury, wealth and ambition not the virtues of good will and friendship etc. Addison and Steele generally advocate following nature, reason and practice of ancients. But these notions are contradictory to enlightenment philosophy. Not only that their views resemble the neoclassical philosophy. Their periodicals brought to the public sphere so the topics of discussion bring among the society and people. They created fictional but familiar realistic characters which later influenced the novels, and Addison also contributed to the development of essay form.


Giambattista Vico (1668-1744)
Vico’s major work was New Science first He published in 1725. He articulated a historical view of the progress of human thought, language and culture that anticipates the evolutionary perspectives of Hegel, Marx and others. Vico included in a group of intellectuals who reacted against central tenets of medieval philosophy and they supported enlightenment rationalist and empiricist thinking. He urges that “new science” must be rational civil theology of divine providence. Vico’s insights into poetry form an integral part of his attempts to explain the origins and development of human society. Vico sees the progression of wisdom or knowledge as moving from the senses through reason to revelation.  Vico categorized the periods in literature as period of “gods” and the next is period of “heroes” and the last period is period of “men”. Vico attributes two important historical functions of poetry; first one is what he calls “poetic wisdom” it was founded in religious and civil institutions of primitive people. Next is, poetry provided the embryonic basis for all further learning.

David Hume (1711-1776)
David Hume was one of the major figures of the enlightenment philosophy. Hume stress the idea that rule of art is not an established setting, experience is the basis for judging a work. True taste according to Hume, is a rational process. Reasoning helps us to set up the overall idea of a text and its uniformity. Hume says poetry is nothing but a chain of propositions and reasoning. The poet himself need taste invention as well as judgment. The standard of taste according to Hume is subjective and restricted qualified people. In attempting to rescue artistic taste from mere subjectivism, Hume appeals to a number of factors, all of which are based on experience.

Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797)
            Mary Wollstonecraft is more popular as feminist writer rather than enlightenment philosopher. She was very much influenced by the French Revolution of 1789. Wollstonecraft has rightly been characterized as an enlightenment thinker, propounding argument in favour of reason and spoke against hereditary privilege and the inequitable apparatus of feudalism. Wollstonecraft apart from the conventional enlightenment elements, showed concern for the economic and educational rights of women, expressed in her best known work A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In this work, she addresses to the issues that have remained crucial to much feminist criticism. Her central argument is that if woman be not prepared by education to become the companion of man, she will stop the progress of knowledge and virtue; for truth must be common to all.
Wollstonecraft’s two central ideas are that not only men but also women have the ‘gift of reason’ and secondly, no authority can simply coerce women into fulfilling a given set of duties. What she is essentially appealing to are the enlightenment principles of reason, duty, freedom, self-determination and even patriotism; her feminism consists in the demand that these same principles extend to women. Wollstonecraft recommends national day schools which will be free to all classes of society, and where both sexes will be educated together. She also had a national feeling that of Dryden. She says these national schools cultivate friendship and love between boys and girls. Mary Wollstonecraft is the female representation of enlightenment society as well as philosophy, because she views enlightenment in the eyes of a woman, not the literary figure. So her principles paves base for the development of enlightenment period’s woman. Later her views are interpreted as feminist, but largely she is the represent of woman in the enlightenment philosophy.

CONCLUSION
Enlightenment period created many thinkers and theories. Rationalism is the predominated theory of this age. But reasoning is differing to each thinker. There are no well established models or ideology is prevalent in this period. All the ideas of each philosophers and writers were collectively characterized under the term ‘enlightenment’. The above discussed writers are not the only pioneers of the period; there are also seminal figures like Kant and Hegel. Both philosophers contributed to the theory of aestheticism. Kant further contributed to “art for art’s sake” in his philosophies, later his philosophy is largely influenced the period, romanticism. Kant said that literature is autonomous and there are no purposes beyond it, and pleasure is the primary aim in literature.  Hegel initially inspired by French Revolution. Hegel’s thoughts affect two major currents of European intellectual and social history, the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Hegel is stressing the supreme idea of reason and the doctrine of empiricism.
                                    From the over emphasis to rationalism and other objective analysis, the enlightenment period give way to highly imaginative and subjective period, a period of transition. The romantic period preached the glory of past life, a kind of nostalgia, rational thinking discarded in the period. The enlightenment thinkers had although humanitarian, intellectual and progressive outlook, but they tried to subjugate both external world of nature and human self. Actually romantic period was a meant to free these shackles of subjugation. Enlightenment tried to make progressive individual, free from superstitions and prejudices and also politically to remove feudal absolutism and religious intolerance. They are successful in their mission. But it also reduced creative writing of the period. There are many theories and philosophies predominated in the enlightenment period, but the numbers of artistic and imaginative works are less than previous period.
                                    It was in the fields of philosophy and literature that Romanticism as a broad response to Enlightenment, Neoclassical and French Revolutionary ideals, initially took root. Romantic view of literature was an intense individualism based on authority of experience and often democratic orientation, as well as optimistic and sometimes utopian belief in progress. Romanticism shared enlightenment notion of possibility of human achievement and conception of human nature as good etc. So at an extend Romanticism was response to Enlightenment and other previous stage, at another hand romanticism took inspiration from enlightenment.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
·         Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Wadsworth: Cengage, 2012. Print
·         Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary Criticism: From Plato to the Present. New Delhi: Blackwell, 2006. Print
·         Habib, M. A. R. Literary Criticism from Plato to the Present: AN INTRODUCTION. Singapore: Blckwell, 2011.Print 
·         Klages, Mary. Literary Theory: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Continuum, 2006. Print


















No comments:

Post a Comment