Tuesday, 20 October 2015

ASSIGNMENT 3 - ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY


       ASSIGNMENT ON ENLIGHTENMENT
                             PHILOSOPHY
          
SUJITHA.M
LCL051521
               
                                INTRODUCTION

                                 Neoclassicism refers to the period between 1600 and 1785 in English literature.  There are many sub periods or sub division between the neoclassical ages. The period between 1660 and 1700 is known as “restoration period”.  Then the “Augustan age” started which extends from 1700 to 1745. “Augustan age” followed the “age of sensibility” or “age of Johnson” (1745 to 1785). Now we are going to look it detailed.
                           The restoration period takes its name from the restoration of the Stuart king Charles second to the English throne in 1660, at the end of commonwealth; it is specified as lasting until 1700. The literature produced during this age reflects the urbanity, wit, and licentiousness of the life centering on the court. Another feature is that the theaters came back more powerfully.  Sir George Etherege, William Wycherley, William Congreve and John Dryden developed the distinctive comedy of manners called “Restoration comedy”. Dryden was the major critic and poet as well as major dramatist of the age. Dryden, Thomas Otway, and other playwrights developed the distinctive form of tragedy called “heroic drama”. Like Dryden one of the notable personalities of the age is Aphra Ben, the first Englishwoman to earn her living by her pen and one of the most inventive authors of the age.
                        After restoration the Augustan age started. This period is also known as “age of Queene Anne. It is quite true that the twelve years of Queene Anne’s reign saw the most famous authors of their generation come to full maturity.  The original Augustan age was the brilliant literary period of Virgil, Horace, and Ovid under the Roman Emperor Augustus (27 BC- AD 14). In the eighteenth century and later, however, the term was also applied to the literary period in England from 1700-1745. The leading writers of the age were Alexander Pope, Jonathan swift, and Joseph Addison. They imitated the literary forms and subjects of the classic age.
                     Augustan age followed the age of Sensibility.  It denote the period between the death of Alexander pope in 1744, and 1785, which was one year after the death of Samuel Johnson and one year before  Robert Burns’ poems, Chiefly in Scottish Dialect. The half century of the period is known as the “Age of Johnson”, stresses the dominant position of Samuel Johnson and his literary and intellectual circle, which included Oliver Goldsmith, Edmund Burke, James Boswell, Edward Gibbon, and Hester Lynch Thrale. These authors on the whole represented a culmination of the literary and critical modes of neoclassicism and the world view of enlightenment.
                The Enlightenment sometimes referred as the age of reason.  It was a confluence of ideas and activities that took place throughout the eighteenth century Western Europe, England, and the American colonies.  The common feature of enlightenment is the belief in human reason. The enlightenment thinkers believe or try to prove that “reason” replace the darkness of superstition, prejudice and barbarity.  Thinkers believed in advances of scientific and industrial development. Reason was the inductive procedure of science. The famous enlightenment thinkers are Francis Bacon, John Locke, William Godwin, Descartes, Voltaire, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft etc.
                             The age of enlightenment and the enlightenment thinker’s views are a turning point in the history of the world. Enlightenment age changed the outlook of the world entirely.  So here I am going to do an assignment on the topic “enlightenment philosophy”.  The following pages contain details regarding neoclassical literary criticism and enlightenment criticism. It also contains major personalities of the age and their critical view.

             NEOCLASSICAL LITERARY CRITICISM
                  Neoclassicism refers to a broad tendency in literature and art enduring from early seventeenth century until around 1750. Neoclassical age is also known as “age of Queene Anne” or “Augustan age”.  Politically, Augustanism refers to the parallels drawn between the emerging structures of English society and those existing in the period of Emperor Augustus in ancient Rome. These parallels were worked out in terms of political similarities and the closeness evident in some kind of cultural conditioning in contemporary England. The process of finding similarities between Augustan periods in ancient Rome and English society began in the early seventeenth century, when writers like Ben Jonson eluded the possibility.
                         Neoclassicism calls for return to the classical models (writings of Horace and Virgil etc), literary styles, and values of ancient Greek and Roman authors. Neoclassicists were to some extent heirs of the Renaissance humanists. Compared to Renaissance humanists, neoclassicists were less ambiguous in their emphasis upon classical values of objectivity, impersonality, rationality, decorum, balance, harmony, proportion, and moderation.  Two of the concepts central to neoclassical literary criticism and practice were imitation and nature. They were closely related. In one sense the notion of imitation of the external world and, primarily, of human action was a reaffirmation of the ideals of objectivity and impersonality. But it also referred to the imitation of classical models, especially of Homer and Virgil. The major critics of the neoclassical age are Corneille, Nicolas Boileau-Despreaux in France Dryden, pope, Aphra Ben and Johnson in England.
 PIERRE CORNEILLE (1606-1684)
                Neoclassical criticism first took root in France .From France it spread to other part of Europe especially England. The major figures of French neoclassicism were Corneille, Racine, Moliere and La Fontain.  Corneille’s theories grew out of the need to defend his dramatic practice against classicists such as Scudery and Jean Chaplin.
                    Corneille born in Normandy and he was primarily a playwright. The most important text of his literary criticism, Trois Discours sur le poeme dramatique (Three Discourses on      Dramatic poetry, 1660), was produced in response to the controversies had ignited, to explain justify his own dramatic practice. These controversies are aroused from his most renowned play Le Cid appeared in 1637. It was not only attacked by the critic but the French literary and political establishment for its failure to observe the rules of classical theater lay down by Aristotle and Horace. The play violated the classical unities of action time and place and also Aristotle’s concept of probability and necessity.  Corneille responded to these charges both by writing further plays displaying his mastery of classical convention and by producing his Three Discourses.  In his third Discourse, entitled “Of Three Unities of Action, Time and Place,Corneille attempts to explain the rational thinking behind his play. Corneille’s desire is to make ancient rules agrees with modern pleasure. He put forward constant experience, actual practice. He appeals not only to a broader vision of Aristotelian probability and necessity but also to other aesthetic criteria such as beauty, comprehensiveness, and unity.  His text is an example of ancient authority and an appeal to experience and theatrical practice.
JOHN DRYDEN (1631-1700)
                    Samuel Johnson called Dryden “the father of English criticism” and praised his Essay of Dramatic Poesy (1668) by claiming that “modern English prose begins here.” Dryden’s critical work was extensive, treating of various genres such as epic, tragedy, comedy and dramatic theory, satire, the relative virtues of ancient and modern writers as well as the nature of poetry and translation. His Essay of Dramatic Poesy is written as a debate on drama conducted by four speakers, Euginius, Crites, Lisiedius, and Neander. The first of these debates is between ancient and modern. Dryden’s Essay is an important intervention in this debate, perhaps marking a distinction between Renaissance and neoclassical values. Like Tasso and Corneille Dryden attempted to strike a compromise between the claims of ancient authority and the exigencies of the modern writer. He speaks about how or in what sense French writers become more popular than the English.  He advocated that English should have a theory instead following French dramatic theory. Dryden considers poetry as a rational activity.
ALEXANDER POPE (1688-1744)
                       Pope’s An Essay on Criticism is generally considered as the clearest statement of neoclassical principles in any language. This work published anonymously in 1711, and explains Roman Catholic outlook with classical aesthetic principles and with deism. Pope written his An Essay on Criticism in verse and it is followed the tradition of Horace’s Ars Poetica. He defines classical values in terms of “nature” and “wit”. Both are necessary for good poetry and criticism. Pope calls for “return to nature”. “Nature” and “wit” both are necessary for poetry and criticism. A good poetry and criticism are divinely inspired. He gives advice for the critics to recognize the overall unity of a work.  A critic needs moral sensibility and a sense of balance in order to criticize a work of art.
APHRA BEHN (1640-1689)
                Aphra Behn was one of the first commercial women writers of the age. She is a victim of gender biases and also an important feminist personality of the neoclassical age.  Her function as a poet in society is masculine. She is one of the founders of English novel and her first novel Oroonoko (1688) is an opposition about slavery. She defends the value of drama by contrasting it favorably with traditional learning as thought in the universities.  The French playwright Corneille appeals to experience rather than classical rules but as a feminist Behn appeal to experience female experience.  In her opinion drama is for entertainment.  The male writers of her age criticized her writings but she responded.  She comments that equality in society is only possible through female education. The male writers of her age treated women as indecent in literature. So she found female education as a solution for these attitudes of males.
SAMUEL JOHNSON (1709-1784)
                    Samuel Johnson is remembered for his two- volume Dictionary of the English Language published in 1755 and Lives of the English Poets (1783).  An integral dimension of Johnson’s literary output and personality was his literary criticism, which was to have a huge impact on English letters.  In his Preface to Shakespeare he criticizes Shakespeare for his violation of three unities put forward by Aristotle. Shakespeare’s character’s represents general manners or nature rather than particular. As a neoclassicist Johnson made frequent comparison between past and present works. He concluded that past works are better than the present.
           Johnson’s classical commitment to reason, probability, and truth was complimented by his equally classical insistence on the moral function of literature.   Through his criticism he tries to prove that he is flexible in his adherence to classical formulations. Johnson stresses on “truth”.  According to him truth is superior to rule.  Johnson’s criticism rested on the classical foundation of adherence to nature, reason and truth. Through the term “nature” he not only means the external world and physical nature but the human nature in its universal and historical embodiment of reason and moral sensibility.
                        
                              ENLIGHTENMENT
                   Enlightenment is an intellectual movement and cultural ambiance which developed in Western Europe during the seventeenth century and reached its height during the eighteenth century. According to Immanuel Kant enlightenment is the liberation of man from his self imposed minority. Scientific rationalism or scientific method was the hallmark of enlightenment. Enlightenment age is also known as “age of reason”. The enlightenment thinkers were by no means uniform in their outlook, but in general they saw themselves as an initiating an era of humanitarian, intellectual, and social progress, underlain by the increasing ability of human reason to subjugate analytically both the external world of nature and the human self. Enlightenment replaced superstition and prejudice of the society. Enlightenment thought was integral to the rise of liberalism and the ascendancy to power of the bourgeois class through the French revolution of 1789 and subsequent revolutions throughout Europe.
                     Francis Bacon and Isaac Newton are frequently mentioned as the progenitors of enlightenment.  Bacon worked in the realm of ideas and language, Newton, the author of Principia was a pure scientist in the modern sense.  Bacon in his work The Advancement of learning (1605) and The New Organon (1620) formulated the method of induction in which ideas are generalize on the basis of actual observation.  Enlightenment thinkers believe or only approved scientific rational thinking. Reality is the only truth. They denied deductive observation.
               Rene Descartes is often called the “father” of modern philosophy. Like Bacon he challenged the basic principles of modern philosophy. In his Discourse on Method he began a skeptical mode of thinking and started to doubt everything until he came to the recognition that his mere process of thought proved his own existence (“I think, therefore I am”).  He also states that never to receive anything as truth until to prove it as truth. Descartes’ single most influential legacy was his philosophy of Dualism. God created two kinds of reality- mind and matter. Mind belonged to man alone and all else was matter. Bacon and Descartes represent what were to become two important strands of enlightenment thought, empiricism and rationalism respectively. Montesquieu, Voltaire, David Hume, Edward Gibbon, Thomas Hobbes and Rousseau are the major political enlightenment figures of the age.  In Europe, Voltaire and Rousseau were the torch bearers of enlightenment literature and philosophy. Latter was a strong advocate for social and reform of all kinds. During this period English literary field also witnessed progress. Tolerance of the religious matter is the central theme of enlightenment literature. Richardson’s Pamela, Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, and Henry Fielding’s Shamela are the products of enlightenment. 
                      The historical and intellectual developments associated with enlightenment had far-reaching effects on literary criticism in terms of the discussion of the language of poetry, notion of taste, and faculties such as wit, judgment, and imagination.  The increasing power of the bourgeoisie, decline of the clergy and nobility, development of constitutional form of development, the increasing power of scientific perspectives, and the development of rationalism and empiricism are the result of enlightenment. 
                    A very direct connection between enlightenment philosophy and literary criticism occurs through the various philosophies of language.  The most important of these theories of language was formulated by John Locke.
JOHN LOCKE (1632-1704)
                As an enlightenment writer Locke’s philosophy has widespread influence. It was Locke who laid the foundations of British Empiricism. Tolerance, moderation and commonsense are the characteristics of his philosophical thinking. His important works are Essay concerning Human Understanding, Two Treatises on Government, Thoughts on Education, and Letters Concerning Tolerations. His philosophy is known as “Tabularasa” which means blank states. He says that mind at birth is blank state upon which experiences would write.  He considers experience as the beginning of knowledge.  Like Hobbes he also put forward social contract theory. In his “state of nature” there was no effective means to enforce natural laws hence arouse the need to setup government. Thus the government was the product of contract and its basis was the concern of people. Thus the king has to operate within the framework of a ‘rule of law’. He clearly analyses the duties of the king and rejects ‘divine right theory’ of divine kingship. He says a king become only the king becomes the support of citizen. Lockian empiricism denied ‘abstract ideas’ claiming that all ideas are concrete.
JOSEPH ADDISON (1672-1719)
            Addison was best known as a poet, dramatist and essayist. He contributed much to the development eighteenth century essay as a literary form.  With the collaboration of his friend Richard Steele he published number of essay in the periodicals such as “tattler” and “spectator”. It was his great ambition to bring philosophical, political and literary discussion within the reach of the middle classes.  Their essay is an attempt to probe the truth of thing, in a dramatic and witty manner for the moral enlightenment of the readers. Both of them used their periodicals for literary, moral and educational purposes.
        Addison is highly influenced by the thoughts of classical writers such as Aristotle and Longinus and also Milton.  Like the psychology by Locke they also made use of more recent observation. Steele calls his age as “corrupt age” concentrating more on luxury and wealth rather than the virtues of friendship and innocence.  In Spectator there are many essays dealing with literary critical issues such as nature of tragedy, wit, genius, and sublime. Like Pope he also attempted to distinguish true and false wit.  Addison finds Dryden’s definition of wit as “a propriety of words and thoughts adapted to the subjects” to be broad; it is possible to apply all writing not only to wit. On the basis of Locke’s definition of wit Addison produced a definition of false wit. True wit consists in the resemblance and congruity of ideas whereas false wit is based on single letters. By holding the values of classical age both Steele and Addison tries to cultivate moral values among the people.
GIAMBATTISTA VICO (1668-1744)
             As an Italian philosopher Vico expressed the historic view of the progress of human thought, language, and culture in his writings. In his major work Scienza Nuova (New Science) he views human nature not as timeless and unchanging but as produced by specific social, religious, and economic circumstances. He made number of speeches on human education.  The purpose of his work is to study the nature of nation based on divine providence. He says that philosophers must ready to spend their time to study the nature which having been made by the god. He rejects Hegel’s notion that is human history is a random or blind series of events. He states the true knowledge teach the knowledge of divine institutions in order to conduct human institutions to the highest good. In short his “science” is the study of mankind. His vision of historical progress allows for a mutual accommodation of divine and human agencies. Vico’s thoughts reflect his approval of early stages of enlightenment thinking.
DAVID HUME (1711- 1776)
             David Hume is a Scottish philosopher and one of the major philosophers of the enlightenment. Like Locke he is an empiricist who believes only in concrete ideas. He states that human knowledge originates from his or her experience. His major philosophical works are A Treaties of Human Nature(1740), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding(1748), An Enquiry concerning the principles of morals(1751) and Political Discourses (1752) etc. His works are generally considers as the manifesto of enlightenment.   Hume was influenced by Locke and Newton. He was a skeptic which separated him from those who trying to create a large comprehensive system of thought.                        
                  He considers empiricism as the signature of enlightenment.  He makes a challenge in traditional classical confidence.  He explains the cause and effect relation properly.  He makes a difference between facts and sentiments or matter of facts and matter of values, the former is based on truth and the latter lacks truth. Art is always appreciated on the basis of sentiments and art always had a sort of value judgment. A standard of taste conform one sentiment over another and condemns one over another.  He then talks about how to regulate classical arts and also about qualified and unqualified critics. According to him there are two kinds of taste: - moral taste and aesthetic taste. One is natural and other is cultivable taste. He is one of the notable figures of the enlightenment.  Hume’s essay On the Standard of Tastes raises questions about the standards of aesthetic judgment.

  MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT (1759-1797)
                         Mary Wollstonecraft acknowledged as the one of the first feminist writers of modern times known as the “mother of Western feminism”.  She was a radical thinker and her central notions were formulated from the French revolution in 1789.  Her first major work A Vindication of the Rights of Man (1790) was a response to Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790).  Then her A Vindication of the rights of Woman (1792) is considers as the founding text or manifesto of western feminism.  In this treaty she advocates for social and moral equality.  She augmented for rational education for both sexes was based on the promise of freedom greeted by the early writers.
                She has rightly been characterized as an enlightenment thinker, propounding arguments in favor of reason.  Through her works she response against enslavement of women due to the lack of education. She criticizes Rousseau’s Emilie for its treatment of male education as superior to female.   Equating female with military men she tries to change the women stereotype as domestic workers.   According to her national education is necessary to women for the future development of a nation.
                                                   CONCLUSION
                   From this assignment on the topic “enlightenment” philosophy we can understand that neoclassical age in English literature followed the age of Enlightenment. Age of Enlightenment is also known as age of reason and it is an idea of progress. The eighteenth century enlightenment philosophy gave a new outlook for the world. Rationalism, Empiricism, ideas and observation these are the key terms related to enlightenment philosophy. We can consider scientific rationalism and scientific method as the hallmark of enlightenment.
              The enlightenment philosophers believed in the realization of truth based on experimentation. The renaissance was the seed behind the blossom of enlightenment. They consider reason as more valuable thing than religion. It is a revolt against religion and church historiography. They stress on the need for history. Thinkers valued individual dignity and advocated both personal freedom and liberation of mind.
                 The period of enlightenment followed the age of romanticism which begins from 1785 or alternatively in 1789, the outbreak of French revolution or in 1798, the publication of Lyrical Ballads by Coleridge and Wordsworth and it ends 1832 the year in which Walter Scott died. Imagination is the key concept of romanticism. It is a reaction against 18th century rationalism and 17th century formalism both considered middle age as an age of barbarism. But the romanticist looks middle ages with respect even nostalgia, finding in them a fascination, colorfulness or spiritual depth. They praised middle age as an age of imagination and feeling of popular poetry and art, of rural simplicity and peace.  Romantic period is somewhat similar to that of neoclassical age which calls upon “return to nature”.
               Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was one of the notable figures in both enlightenment and romanticism.  Kant’s account of the role of imagination in an aesthetic judgment laid the foundation for a great deal of romantic theory and literary practice. he defines aesthetic judgment as an ability to judge an object.
                The two thinkers who made much contribution to the romantic period were Rousseau and Herder. Rousseau is known as the “messiah of romantic movement” and also the “father of romantic movement”.  He is the child of enlightenment. Hegel was another literary critic of the age.   In total we can say that romanticism is an opposition against the eighteenth century enlightenment in the sense that latter is based on reason.
                  BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Abrams, M. H.A Glossary of Literary Terms. Wadsworth: Cengage, 2012. Print. 
2. Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary Criticism: from Plato to the Present. New         Delhi: Blackwell, 2006. Print.
3. Habib, M. A. R. Literary Criticism from Plato to the Present: An Introduction.          Singapore: Blackwell, 2011. Print.
4.  Klages, Mony. Literary Theory: A Guide to the Perplexed. Newyork: Continuum, 2006. Print.
5. Wimsatt K, William and Cleanth Brooks. Literary criticism: A Short History. New Delhi: Oxford. 1957. Print.











No comments:

Post a Comment