Monday, 7 September 2015

Hasheera A-1 Mimesis



MIMESIS

Mimesis is a critical term came from the Greek word  mimos  mean ‘to imitate’ .The word
carries a variety of meaning in diverse realm which include imitation,
representation, mimicry,imitatio,receptivity,theatricality,verisimilitude,doubling, corres-
pondence, nonsensuous similarity, the act of resembling, the act of expression and the
presentation of the self .Mimesis has a great significance in the realm of criticism .The word
depicts the relation between art and life . Mimesis is a theory of art, so at the early age it is
associated with idea of artistic representation.

The idea of mimesis has been put forward by a number of thinkers, not only the ancient critics
but the renaissance and modern also .The idea of mimesis is put forward by Plato in relation
with his view about art especially with poetry.  Plato believed mimesis is an obstacle to
philosophical knowledge not a distinct means of knowing the world and other. Plato argued
that idea is the original ,the things we see in nature is the copy of original and the art which is a
copy of nature or an imitation of natural things  .Plato used mimesis in the sense of imitation
.Aristotle, disciple of Plato also treat mimesis in the sense of imitation but it has a slight
difference from Plato’s view .Aristotle in his treaty ‘Poetics’ define poetry as an imitation of
action, that means the human action. By ‘imitation’ he means ‘representation’. Imitation was a
central theme in discussing the nature of poetry of both seventeenth and eighteenth century
.Aristotle also defines mimesis as the perfection and imitation of nature .Aristotle
express his views on imitation in his treaty entitled as ‘Poetics’. He argued that poetry is not
only an imitation of nature but also a creative of an artist that means the poet. Aristotle define
tragedy is an imitation of action, not only an imitation but it can purify the emotions of its
spectators. Both Plato and his disciple Aristotle contrasts mimesis with diegesis.

Greek author Dionysius creates an influential literary method of imitation known as Dionysian
imatatio in the 1st century BCE. This method portrays imitation as a technique of rhetoric –
imitating, adjusting, reworking and enriching a source text by an author. His view on mimesis is
significantly differing from Aristotle’s views on mimesis. Dionysius gives emphasis on imitation
of  authors in contrary to Aristotle’s focus on imitation of nature.
Imagery and involvement of the theatre consist of another essential element in the theory of
mimesis. Theatre is not identical with mimesis .But theatre and theatricality is   central to the
theory of mimesis, because since ancient times it is impossible to separate the two ideas.
Theatrical mimesis aroused from a particular kind of action and awareness, from the liability of
actor and audience rather than being of the spectacle. Augustine tries to define theatrical –
mimesis  in terms of the interaction of spectator and spectacle. Theatrical mimesis depends on
social convention while imitatio depends on conscious use of convention.

Realism give emphasize to reproduce the world as it is, rather than that mimesis matches our
conventional ways of knowing the world.  Realism occurs in the interaction of work and witness
and not of work and world .This notion of realism is known as verisimilitude. The term was
coined at the age of Renaissance. Verisimilitude defines the work as true to life rather than
the replica of life. Artistic realism is not only the most familiar, but one of the most
controversial elements in the thematic complex of mimesis.
Plato concern the weird power of art to mirror the material world, that the realistic artists
Intents. Plato also critcizes mimesis to its inability to go beyond this mirroring, it appeals only to
the wits not to reason, that is the most important criteria of realism-the accurate reproduction of material reality.
Matthew Potolsky in his work Mimesis suggests “mimesis has always been at once a theory of
art and an explicit or implicit theory of human nature.”

“With the emergence in the early nineteenth century of an expressive criticism, imitation
tended to be displaced from its central position in literary theory”(Abraham p172).

Modern theorist such as Lacan, Derrida & Freud observe mimesis in a different way from its
ancient theorist.  Matthew Potolsky in his work  Mimesis  states that many of the social theorists
of nineteenth century define imitation as a foundational human behavior.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche, philosophers of nineteenth century believed that our lives are
governed by conventional imitations that pass for facts of nature.  “The theory of mimesis in
twentieth century implies that what look like autonomous actions and choices are really forms of
imitation” (Potolsky, p .117).

Gabriel Tarde, an important psychological theorist of mimesis in late nineteenth century defines
mimesis in his book entitled  ‘The Laws of Imitation’ that imitation as a fundamental life force
,one of the three great forms of ‘universal repetition’ that organize psychological, biological and
social life .

French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan introduce the term ‘mirror stage’ to elaborate the concept of
‘identification’ ,introduced by Freud .Freud regards identification as an emotional tie between
two people where as Lacan treats it as a mimetic relationship between still undeveloped ego and
its mirror stage .Before the child identifies with its parents, it identifies with an image of  itself
.This is what he called ‘mirror stage’ ,a primordial identification .
.

CLASSIC VIEW ON MIMESIS
Mimesis is an inevitable term in the theories of -
Criticism, so there are number of theories put forward on mimesis. Even though mimesis is a
fifth century term ,it had got a fine position since the time of Plato . Plato was the first , who
put forward the theory of art in general terms . He had strong influence on Socrates, Plato’s
teacher .  He used dialogue as a format to convey his view in his treaty Republic . Plato begins
his view on poetry in Book three.  There is no place for emotion in his ideal world . Plato put
across his view on imitation in his treaty entitled as ‘Republic’ written around 380 BCE . His
allegory of cave  can be considered as an introduction to his idea of mimesis and blame against
poet . Plato believe what  artisan  make is the imitation of ideal form .  The prisoner sees the
statue’s shadow and believed that it is real .The prisoners they never saw  actual reality, so they
believed that the image they sees are the real one. Prisoner, who come outside the cave sees the
actual reality ,the actual truth He never comments on the existing notion of mimesis, he only
redefine art as an essentially mimetic or imitation of nature .Plato express his view on imitation
with his view on poetry . His comments on poetry is found in his two treaties –Ion and Republic
.His Republic had inspired several defenses of poetry like Sidney’s defense on poetry .  There
was an ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry ,which Plato revealed in his premise of
Republic . Plato through his work Republic approaches mimesis in two contexts, first in Book
two and three and then in ten .The earlier notion of mimesis is associated with the art but  Plato
linked it with human nature and political life .Mimesis is a luxury not an essential one . So, Plato
separate mimesis from rational and essential, instead he equate it with pleasure and passion
rather than reason and truth.  Plato starts to discuss about artistic imitation in the second book of
his work, Republic  . In book two of Republic Socrates, master of Plato expresses that there  is a
relation between artistic imitation and behavioral imitation .That means artistic imitation produce
behavioral imitation .When we telling a story, an artistic imitation to younger generations there is
a lot of possibilities to imitate the bad or good action represented in story to the younger
generation . Socrates argued that “mimesis is not serious; it is mere play rather than true
knowledge. Artists such as Homer ‘don’t lay hold of the truth’ but only mime the appearance of
wisdom” (Plato,1991: 283).
Plato’s discussion on art is revealed in the book ten of his ‘Republic’.   Plato believed that idea
is the original and what we sense is only a copy of the original idea.
This is known as ‘doctrine of ideas’ .Plato assumed that art is an imitation or a copy of an idea.
So art twice removed from reality. Plato explain his doctrine of idea by using an image of a bed
.He states that actual bed is the one made by the god .A carpenter, who create a bed is only a
copy of gods actual bed .Then a poet  create a  bed ,  such bed is a copy of the bed made by the
carpenter . That is poet’s bed is twice removed from the actual bed made by the god .It shows that art is twice removed from reality . Jean-Pierre Vernent, French
classical scholar explains that Plato’s concept of mimesis find a new hope in the history of
Greek’s view on art. In Book ten of his Republic Plato banishes poet from his ideal state due to
nature of art, far removed from reality. Plato needs all arts to be directed by moral values.
.Imitative art does not possess this moral value but has a corrupting influence on man. He
stood against artistic imitation because that deviates from the realm of reason .Plato condemn the
poetic imitation because it “fed and watered the passion instead of drying them up ,and let them
rule instead of ruling them as they ought to be ruled ,with a view to the happiness and virtue of
mankind” (37) .Plato support the narrative form than imitative  because he believed that the later
one directly represents evil .In Book 5 of  Republic ,he favors the art that contribute in the
spiritual growth of people  .Imitative art which has a role in the spiritual growth of a people  ,has
a key site in his view . Not the pleasure but truth is an end of such imitation. Both the term
‘mimesis and ‘diegesis’ were first appeared in Plato’s Republic .Diegesis means narration .Plato
Favours  digesis than mimesis.
Aristotle, most celebrated disciple of Plato put a view on
Mimesis in his celebrated treatise entitled as Poetics written in between 360 and 320 BCE
.Aristotle challenges Plato’s claim about the nature and effect of mimesis. But both have a
common view that art is an imitation. Aristotle in his treaty argued that all the various forms of
music and poetry are imitations and he also divided the imitations in three ways : in the means
used , in the kinds of object used in it and in the mode of representation .Aristotle regard as the
essential characteristic of poet is an imitation ,which he expressed in his book one of    Poetics .
In contrast to Plato’s view on poet as a  divinely possessed and standing distant from his fellow
creature of human and he creating an irrational emotions ,Aristotle argued that poet is  rationally
developing basic quality and he share it with other fellows .That is he is an integral part of
human society . Aristotle argued that imitation of men involved in action is the one common to
all arts ,that is the object of artistic imitation which differ artistic imitation from others  . He
added that the actions imitated must be either a noble or base one. The noble one we seen in
tragedy and the base in epic also . But Plato believed that art must produce noble one only
otherwise it destruct people’s morality . Aristotle provide two manners for presentation of an art
– one is a narration ,here poet speak   either in his own person or through speech and the second
one dramatic presentation, in which story is acted as in drama .In later part of        Poetics,
Aristotle distinguish poetry and history .He argue that poetry yields general truth whereas
history produce a particular facts only .Poetry is serious and more philosophical than history
,because the first one express what is universal and the other concern with individuals .In his
Poetics Aristotle define poetry in two way –one lay emphasis on probability and universality and
the other is a wide-ranging one pleasing to morality and convention .
Unlike Plato, who consider imitation as a mirror of something else and it mislead human,
Aristotle consider it as a creativeness of an artist’s or  poet’s .Aristotle broadened the  concept of
poetic imitation that poet must imitate one of the three – the things  were ,the things that we think
or say and the thing which ought to be . Aristotle believed that poetic imitation can appeal the
conventions , it can appeal men’s opinion . For example if  a poet may not represent the gods
truthfully he can present them in accordance with the prevailing myth and view about the god .
Differ from Plato’s metaphor ,which  highlight artificiality  Aristotle’s metaphors for poetry
emphasize the naturalness of mimesis .That is his metaphors show similarity to natural
objects .For example in his Poetics he compare the unity of plot to that of a body  .
Another important idea Aristotle deals in his Poetics is tragedy .Aristotle define tragedy is
“ an imitation of action that is serious, complete and of a certain magnitude –by means of
language enriched with all kinds of ornament ,each used separately in the different parts of the
play : it represents men in action and does not use narrative, and through pity and fear it effects
relief to these and similar emotions” (Poetics,vi.2-3) .By action, Aristotle does not mean a
particular action but a way of action done by the protagonist and what happen to him  .Aristotle
consider that  a tragedy must have  six essential elements ,that are spectacle, song, diction, plot
,characters and reasoning .Plot is the primary element of tragedy  not a character .Then he deals
with three unities of a tragedy. That is unity of action, unity of time and unity of place. A tragedy
is not only an imitation of action but a combination of the three elements also .Aristotle argued
that tragedy is an imitation of whole or complete action ,by this he mean the action must has a
beginning ,middle and an end .

RECREATION OF HOMER

The greatest Roman poet and critic of  Augustus age, Horace
wrote a work in literary criticism entitled as Ars Poetica or Art of Poetry .It is a kind of guide to
the literary work of art  . The work has a threefold structure - content of poetry, mode of poetry
and an argument about a poet .Differ from Aristotle ,Horace is more practical .He always quote
example from Greek poet’s . Because he believed that they follow the  true poetic model .
Horace considers that poetic decorum is the primary one and it is also a mean to judge all works.
He  regards verisimilitude as a poetic norm .Horace opt medias res as the mode of narration. He
The Odyssey is a classical work written by Horace, in which he use the medias res as the mode
of narration. Then he explains  about the poetic form . Horace argued that excessive violent
incidents does not present in it because it effects the people morally . For Horace  poets are born
as well as made .By imitation he means to  emulating and following the way of great models.
The ultimate aim for poetry Horace believed is to instruct and afford pleasure . His concept of
imitation means recreation not as a copying . Renaissance critic such as Sidney depends on
Horace to interpret Aristotle .Ben Jonson was a translator of Horace’s  Ars Poetica .




IMITATION AS AN INFLUENCE

On the Sublime is a critical document written by Longinus , a
Greek  philosopher. Here he defines what sublimity is and how it can achieve. The work written
in epistolary form in 100 CE . It was a response on monograph on sublimity of  Caecilius ,a
Greek  philosopher. Sublimity on literature means the elevated and lofty style of writing . That
means  it is beyond ordinary ordinary writing . Longinus define sublimity as the

“source of  the distinction of the very greatest poet and prose writers the
means by which they have given life to their own fame” .

Later Longinus explain the way to attain this sublimity .Natural genius, imitation and
imagination are the three sources of sublimity. One  of the way Longinus reveal to attain
sublimity is the way of imitation of great poet and historian of the past . Plato who initiate this
way in his treaty , he capture from Homer .He regard that  as the  priestess of Apollo is inspired
by the god’s divine power the poet can also inspired by innate genius of old writers . Longinus
believed that borrowing from other writers as Plato borrow from Homer is not a theft but as gain
an impression from fine character  . In an essay Tradition and Individual Talent , Eliot considers
knowing the past writers will make an influence on a writer’s writings , that leads his work
beyond an ordinary that means sublimity .

MIMESIS: A NEW CREATION

Sir Philip Sidney in his celebrated work  Apologie for
Poetrie  expressed his views on poetry .He agreed with Aristotle’s view that poetry is an
imitation . By imitation he does not means mere a copy of nature . Sidney believed that major
function of poetry as an imitation is to teach and delight .By imitation he does not mean   mere a
copy of nature or facts but representing real and sometime creating something entirely new .
Then he widen his view on imitation by adopting basics from both Aristotle and Horace .Sidney
says that poetry  “is an art of imitation ,for so Aristotle termeth it in his word ‘mimesis’ ,that is to
say ,a representing ,counterfeiting ,or figuring forth: to speak metaphorically, a speaking picture :
with this end ,to teach and delight” (223) .Sidney explain three kinds of poetic imitation in his
treaty . First consists of poetry, as in the poetic portion of the Old Testaments the poetry ‘imitate
the inconceivable excellencies of God’ ,that is a religious poetry. The second kind of imitation
found in a poetry, the scope of the subject in such poetry are philosophical, historical or
scientific-a philosophical poetry .Third kind of imitation , that make poetry free from the
Aristotelian constrains . That is poetry as an imaginative treatment of life and nature .
MIMESIS IN AESTHETICISM
Oscar wild an Irish writer and poet viewed art does
not copy life and nature but constitute its own world of reality .Art became independent not a
copy of nature or real world, but a creative power of humanity .He is a proponent of aestheticism
that give emphasis to art for art’s sake . For aestheticians art is only for enjoyment not a
mirroring or representation .Wild and Baudelaire ,anti realists  argued that true aim of art is
beauty not the reproduction of world or reality . Wild argued that art never bound to reproduce
the world  as it is, instead it wants a power to transform  and improve the world ,it distinguish art
from life .



VER ISIMILITUDE IN REALISM

Realism is a notion which focus on the
portraying of world as we sense it is .Realist consider art as a medium to show the world  as it is
.Plato concern the mysterious power of art to world and he also criticizes mimesis to this kind of
mirroring , because he believed mirroring appeal not for reason but for senses only .Accurate
reproduction of material reality is the major criteria of realism which we can see in arts like
photography and perspectival painting. These arts represent the material world to its viewers.
Plato’s reflection theory on realism means realism is the reflection of the material world as it is
.But Aristotle consider the realism of work is intellectual than material .So he give emphasis to
organizing plot according to necessity and probability, the convention  .This is known as
Aristotle’s theory of convention on realism . Mimesis laid on the conventional ways of knowing
the world rather than reproducing the world , like atrical mimesis the realism occur in the
interaction of work and spectator. That means a work is true to life than the replica of life .This
realistic idea is known as verisimilitude.

Film, one of the contemporary medium to portrays realism. Here camera is a
mirror to reflects the world and convention is also used in it to signal the truthfulness of the work
Realist consider that literature as mirror of nature in addition to it realists redefine mirror as
metaphor for the truthfulness of their work .  George Lucas and Erich Auerbach believe realism
offer most truthfull picture of the world as it is by using  the conventional method proposed by
Aristotle .




IMITATION AS A HUMAN NATURE

Human beings are the most advanced organism in the world .They are trying to adapt with the
world around them .When an infant was born, he had no knowledge about the world around him.
Slowly he starts to observe things and tries to identify them. He starts to observe his parents
especially their behavior then he starts to imitate them. A child responds to the world by
imitating their parents .At the early stage child does not acquisite language. Lacan, the French
Freud call this stage an ‘imaginary’ and the stage after the acquisition of language is called  as
symbolic . Lacan argued that there is a stage called  mirror stage  in between these two. In this
stage child starts to imitate his parents .Child starts to speak by imitating his parent’s sounds and
gestures .He imitate the habits of their parents also . At this stage the infant learn to identify with
his image in a mirror and begins to develop a sense of a separate self and an understanding of
oneself . Lacan developed his idea of mirror stage from the concept of ‘identification’ put
forward by Sigmund Freud ,Viennese psychologist .Both Lacan and Freud consider mimesis as a
primary aspect of human life . Both memory and habit are  forms of imitation also ,first one
recall the psychic image and the next one repeat the action .Imitation begins in family .
Freud believed that our deliberate action and procedures are directed by our unconscious desires
and memories . Freud has influenced by Aristotle, his therapeutic method is known as cathartic
method because it can purify the painful memories of patients through hypnosis. Freud
concern the theory of mimesis through his notion of identification. By notion of identification,
Freud means the self arises from an unconscious imitation of others. Identification is the key
concept of psychoanalysis .Freud define identification as
“the earliest expression of an emotional tie with another person” (1953-74:xviii, 105 ) .
Identification is an unconscious activity .So it differ from consciously bounded activities such as
empathy, influence and it also made identity .

Gabriel Trade , a French psychologist and  he had an influence on ideas of  Freud .Trade define
mimesis in his work ‘The Laws of Imitation’ as a “fundamental life force, one of the three
greatest forms of universal repetition  that organize physical ,biological and social life : imitation
played a role in societies analogous that of heredity in organic life or to that of vibration  among
inorganic bodies” (Trade, 1962: 11) .


MODERN FACE OF MIMESIS

Differ from Aristotelian classic view on mimesis twentieth century theorists
such as Jacques Derrida, Walter Benjamin, Adorno and Girard approach mimesis  in a diverse
way. Derrida uses the idea of mimesis in relation to texts. He argued that mimesis resists
theory and construct a world of illusion, aesthetic and images in which existing world are
changed and re-interpreted .Freud identifies his concept of identification with the early stage of
human development and he also claim that what we call personality is nothing more than the
history of our identification .
French literary critics Rene Girard viewed mimesis as a primordial tendency in human life,
which Plato intensely misinterprets .Girard argued that mimesis as vibrant social force that lies at
the origins of religion and culture. Girard came across the evidence of ‘mimetic desire’ in history
of novel  .Romantic myth regards desire as spontaneous, original and unique to each individual
,Girard never support the view and he used the history to questioning this notion of desire .Girard
pointed that mimetic desire never reduced into Plato’s paradigm .Eventhough it is imitated
,desire does not divided into original and copy  .Originality is the result of desire not its reality
.Girard identify two categories of meditation –external and internal .Both the external and
internal meditation reveal that desire is produced by mimesis not need .

ROUSSEAU’S VIEW ON MIMESIS

Mimesis is not only an imitation of nature but a way to understand
human socio cultural life. There is a twist in the Aristotelian notion of mimesis, an imitation of
nature, through the writings of Rousseau and Lessing. They consider mimesis in associate with
the individual creativity. Rousseau in his theory of acting argued that a mimesis has a basic role
in human social life.  Like Plato Rousseau also viewed imitation as both deceptive and cause of
dangerous and unreasonable emotions. Rousseau argued “ the foundation of imitation among us
comes from the desires always to be transported out of ourselves” (Rousseau ,1979;104) .
Rousseau’s view on mimesis give emphasis to conscious act of mimesis in social life whereas
other nineteenth century theorists hold up Freud’s  unconscious forms of  mimesis in culture .


CONCLUSION

Mimesis is a term of censure, it had a Greek
origin .The term has a relation with both arts and life. That’s why work of most writers are
occupied by  this term . Both Plato’s and Aristotle’s classical view illustrate that mimesis is an
imitation . Horace believed that imitation is not copying but recreating something that already
exist .Longinus regards imitation is an influence of past writers on the present. He viewed
mimesis as a way to achieve sublimity . Sidney, a Renaissance critic express his idea in his
Apologie for Poetrie mimesis is not only an imitation but a creation of something new . He
divided poetic imitation into three . Realists  called this imitation as a  verisimilitude . Psycho
analytical theorist also give an important place to mimesis .Freud called imitation as an
identification .Lacan also developed his view on imitation from Freud’s view .

















BIBLIOGRAPHY
Potolsky Matthew ,Mimesis, London: Routledge ,2006 .
Abrahams, M. H .The Mirror and the Lamp , London: Oxford ,
·         Aristotle Aristotle’s Theory of Poetry and Fine Art, trans. S. H. Butcher, New York: Dover1951 .
Trade, Gabriel: The Laws of Imitaton ,1962 .
·         Freud, Sigmund (1953-74)  :The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of
Sigmund Freud, trans, j ,Strachey, London: Hogarth Press .

·         Nagarajan M S . English Literary Criticism and Theory Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan, 2006 .

·         Habib, M. A. R A History of Literary Criticism From Plato to the Present, USA: Blackwell Publishing , 2005 .

·         Abraham M.H   A Glossary of Literary Terms, Newyork: Cengage Learning, 2011.






No comments:

Post a Comment