TERM PAPER
ARS
POETICA
SALMANUL FARIS K
I MA ECL
“If
in a picture, Piso, you should see
A
handsome woman with a fish’s tale
Or
a man’s head upon a horse’s neck
or
limbs of beasts of the most different kinds
covered
with feathers of all sorts of birds
would
you not laugh, and thinks the painter mad?”
Ars Poetica, or “The
Art of Poetry,” is a poem written by ancient Roman poet Horace who advises in
the poem about the poets on the art of writing poetry and drama. The work was
written during the Augustan age and it was known as the golden age of Roman
literature. In that glorious age of literature, Horace was one of the leading members
of the illustrious circle of poets patronized by the emperor Augustus. At the
same time a great satirist of his time. He was a younger contemporary of Virgil
and stands almost equal to Virgil in Poetry.
Horace produced a
number of lyric poems (epodes), odes, and verse epistles. His epistles are
mostly deals with the subject of poetry. "Epistle to Florus", “Epistle
to Augustus” and ”Epistle to the Pisones" are examines the role of poetry
in its state and asserts the merit of poetry. The famous “Epistle to the
Pisones” is known as “Ars Poetica” or “The Art of Poetry”. Ars Poetica has
influenced the writers of the subsequent generations in Europe. Some of the
writers considered Ars Poetica as their literary manual.
Quintilian was the
first person who give the title Ars Poetica (Art of Poetry) or Fiber de' Arte Poetica
(book of the poetic art) to Horace’s “Epistle to the Pisones”. Pisones are a
famous Roman family with an interest in literature, poetry and literary
criticism. Precisely to the senior Piso, Lucius Calpurnius Piso and his two
sons. Ars Poetica is letter in form, a long conversational poem discussed about
poetry. This form of poetry were widely imitated by later poets like, Geoffrey
Of Vinsauf in the twelfth century, Pierre De Ronsard in the sixteenth century Nicolas
Boileau in the seventeenth, Alexander Pope in the eighteenth, Lord Byron in the
nineteenth, and Wallace Stevence in the twentieth.
In his distinguished critical
work “Essay on Criticism”, Pope pays the following tribute to Horace:
Horace
still charms with graceful negligence,
and
without method talks us into sense,
Will,
like a friend, familiarly convey,
The
thrust notions in the earliest way.
The genre of literary
theory in verse form present many challenges. Because of the requirements of versification, the structure of Horace’s text
is dictated less logical argumentation than by verbal association and
rhetorical one.
While heavily indebted
to Greek literature, and in particular to Aristotle (especially the Poetics and
Rhetoric), the Ars Poetica is neither a systematic exposition of a coherent theory
of poetic composition nor a comprehensive textbook for aspiring writers.
Instead it is an argument for poetry as craft. Another key principle that
dominates the whole of the An Poetica is decorum. It is the most acceptable
Horatian principle which appealed to later European neoclassical critics.
They often applied
standards of decorum as more rigid than Horace himself would have. The Ars Poetica"
has no clear design or the theory of poetry and drama. Here the poet mixes numerous literary maxims in a manner which
is likely to confuse an ordinary reader. A critic rightly calls the poem “art
without an art”. Horace had borrowed his doctrines and precepts from the study
of Greek masters, especially from Aristotle’s "Poetics". Plato had emphasized
on the didactic angle of poetry and had said that it should make better
citizens. On the other hand, Aristotle laid stress on the aesthetic delight of
poetry, Horace synthesizes both there ideals and says: “a poet should instruct,
or please, or both”—line 370.
“Ars Poetica” begin
with the ‘unity’ and ‘consistency’. If a painter should wish to unite a horse’s
neck to a human head, and spread a variety of plumage over limbs [of different
animals] taken from every part [of nature], so that what is a beautiful woman
in the upper part terminates unsightly in an ugly fish below; could you, my
friends, refrain from laughter, were you admitted to such a sight. It is a
question for the reader which is whether he laughed at such sight or not?
Through this suggestion Horace try to say about the unity and consistency.
A poem must have
organic unity; all the parts must be vitally connected with one another. The
poet is free to indulge his fancy, but he must not lapse into absurdity and
create monsters or impossible figures.
The poet must choose only those subjects which he is able to deal with.
The subject must suit both the power and style of the poet.
We can categorize the
topics which discussed in the poem.
The
subject-matter of Poetry
The subject-matter of
poetry should be simple, i.e., from familiar material, and uniform, that is
full of wholeness. He says that he who chooses his subject wisely, will find
that neither words nor lucid arrangement will fail him, for sound judgment is
the basis and source of good writing.
Poetic
Diction
Horace will always be
remembered for his theory of poetic diction. Poetic diction, he says, can never
be altogether established and stationary affair. The function of language in
poetry is to express; but man’s experience, which poetry exists to express, is
continually changing, since it is continually adding to itself. With the growth
of experience, the language of poetry must keep pace, if it is to be truly
expressive. Language is like a tree; and its words are like leaves. As the
years go on, the old leaves fall, and new leaves take their place; but the tree
remains the same. Horace’s observations on poetic diction are like those of
Aristotle. Following Aristotle, he also emphasises the right choice of words
and their effective arrangement in composition. A poet is free to use both
familiar and new words. New words continually go on coming to the poet like new
leaves to the tree. The poet must not rely wholly on the vocabulary of his
predecessors; he must coin new words too.
His
Observations on Style
Horace wished that the
writer should observe the settled forms and shades of style in poetry. He
pointed out some of the shortcomings of style. ‘I endeavour to be brief and
become obscure; sinew and spirit desert the searcher after polish : one
striving for grandeur becomes bombastic; whosoever is excessively cautious and
fearful of the tempest crawls along the ground; and he who yearns after too
prodigal a variety in his theme— he paints a dolphin in the forest, or a wild
boar amid the waves. If the poet does not have genuine artistry, the effort to
avoid an imperfection leads him into graver butchery.
Metres
and their appropriateness
‘Homer has shown us in
what metre may best be written the deeds of kings and great captains, and
sombre war. Verses of unequal length were first used for laments, later also
for the sentiment that attends granted beseechings. The Muse has given to the
lyre the celebration of the gods and their offspring, the victorious boxer, the
horse, first in the race, the amorous yearnings of youth, and the unrestrained
pleasures of wine. If one does not know and cannot observe the conventions and
forms of poems, he does not deserve to be called a poet. Comic material, for
instance, is not to be treated in the verses of tragedy ; similarly, it would
be outrageous to narrate the feast of Thyestes in verse proper to common daily
life and almost to comedy.’ Sincerity of Emotion
‘It is not enough for
poems to have beauty; they must also be pleasing and lead the listener’s soul
whither they will. If you would have me weep, you must first express grief
yourself.
Views on Drama
In Ars Poetica the
treatment of drama is desultory. No systematic theory of drama is presented on
a larger basis. Only fragmentary and casual views are expressed, e.g. ‘Either
follow tradition or invent a story which is consistent. But the conventional
features of traditional characters should be preserved.’ ‘If in your tale you
represent the renowned Achilles, let him appear restless, passionate,
inexorable and dauntless.’ ‘If you commit a new theme on the stage and venture
to create a new character, ct the first impression be preserved to the end, and
let his nature be consistent. ‘Let not Medea murder her children in front of
the audience nor impious Atreus cook human flesh in the public nor Procne be
changed into bird. Let a play be neither shorter nor longer than five acts and
let no god intervene unless some problem arises that demands to be solved. The
number of actors should not be more than three and the chorus should form an
integral part of the action and its songs should advance and subserve the
interest of the plot.’ ‘Let it support the good and give them kindly counsel,
restrain the wrathful and favour those who fear to sin; let it praise the fare
of a simple table, salutary justice and Law and Peace with open gates’.
Horace studies drama
under three heads : plot, characterization and style. Plot should be borrowed
from familiar material; the chorus should be an integral part of the plot;
characters should behave consistently and naturally; iambic metre was most
suitable for drama. Dramatic speech should observe propriety : it should suit
the character, its sex, its age; its station in life, its circumstances, its
moods. A god will speak differently from a mortal, a man from a woman, an aged
man from a heated youth, a prosperous merchant from a poor farmer, a man in
grief from a man in joy, an angry-fellow from a playful one. if you utter words
ill-suited to your part, I shall either doze or smile.’ In all this Horace
closely follows Aristotle.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary
Criticism: From Plato to the Present. New Delhi: Blackwell, 2006. Print
2.
The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism.
Ed. Leitch B Vincent. New York: W.W Norton and Company Ltd. 2001. Print.
3.
Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary
Terms. Wadsworth: Cengage, 2012. Print
"
No comments:
Post a Comment