Wednesday, 11 November 2015

TERM PAPER ON MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT



TERM PAPER ON MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT’S A VINDICATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN
                        
   SUJITHA.M
     1 M A ECL
    LCL051521

                      The eighteenth century enlightenment figure Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women (1792) is generally considered as the founding text or manifesto of western feminism.  Nineteenth century American feminists considered her as their founding mother of feminism. Mary Wollstonecraft (1757-1797), acknowledged as one of the feminist writers of modern times and she belongs to the first wave feminism. She was a radical thinker whose central notions were formed from the debates and issues that aroused as a result of the French Revolution in 1789.  She writes as a philosopher, moralist, and an authority of education of women, book reviewer, a non-sexual voice of reason and religious contemplation, and as a political projector at the time of French revolution. Her ideas argued for changing the French constitution and its tyranny.  She propounding arguments in favor of reason and rational thinking; she is against the hereditary privilege and the entire inequitable apparatus of feudalism, so that we can rightly been considered her as an enlightenment thinker.
                We can consider Wollstonecraft as a revolutionary figure in a revolutionary time – French Revolution.  She always inspired controversy.  She not only argued for women’s educational and moral equality, but acted against the principles of political authority, tyranny, liberty, class, sex, marriage, child rearing, property, prejudice, reason, sentimentality, promises, and suicide etc.  
                         Mary Wollstonecraft’s troubled life story reflects her ideological dispositions. She is the second born and the first daughter of six children in a family. At the hands of somewhat despotic father she suffered a lot. Her formal education ended at the age of fifteen. Due to some economic problems faced in the early life she started to earn living in the conventional female occupation as governess and lady maid. At that time she taught herself French, German, Dutch and Italian languages. She opened a school at Newington Green with her two younger sisters and friend Fanny Blood for the education of children and women but the school gets failed.
                   As a woman she was a victim of two unsuccessful loves, first with the painter Henry Fuseli, and then with an American business man, Gilbert Imlay whose infidelity led her to two suicide attempts.   At last her friendship with the political philosopher and critic William Godwin turned in to a successful love and both of them opposed the principles of marriage.  Later they married for the legitimacy of their child the future Mary Shelley, the author of the Gothic novel Frankenstein and the wife of Shelley.  In 1797 Wollstonecraft died of an infection contracted during unsuccessful attempts to remove her broken and expelled placenta, after giving birth to the daughter.  Wollstonecraft’s husband Godwin wrote her biography under the title Memoirs of the Author of the Rights of Woman in the year 1798. It is a frank account of her sexual life.
              Now we have to look her literary life. As an enlightenment and feminist figure she focused on children’s and women’s rights in society. Through her works she spread her enlightenment principles of reason, duty, freedom and self determination and patriotism. In the year 1786 she published her first work Thoughts on the Education of Daughters.  A keen and vital concern with education, especially the education of daughters and women run throughout her writing. In 1788 she published her first novel Mary, a Fiction and then published Maria or the Wrongs women. In 1790 she had written A Vindication of the rights of men as a response to Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the revolution in France (1790). Edmund Burke was a British writer and polemicist and he wrote in favors of French revolution and states that citizen should not rebel against their government in order to revolutionize its tradition. As a cultural critic Wollstonecraft opposed it and she states that rights cannot be based on tradition, it is only based on reason and rationality.
                   It is already said that A Vindication of the Rights of Women (1792) is a founding text of western feminism. As a work on education A Vindication of the Rights of Women received wild recognition. After England and France declared war it was increasingly read against the backdrop of its progressive agendas on behalf of liberty. She had written this treaty as a response to the French National Assembly’s declaration of the rights in 1789. This declaration said nothing about the rights of women. The report of the declaration is prepared by the personality Charles Maurice de Talleyrand- Perigord.  He stated that women should only receive a domestic education. As an immediate response she wrote the essay and after that she intended to write a more thoughtful second volume. Unfortunately before completing this volume she died.
                 A Vindication of the Rights of Women proposing the model for equality or ‘liberal’ feminism.  Influenced by the enlightenment thinkers such as Voltaire, Rousseau, and John Locke Wollstonecraft commented that male and female are same in most aspects, possessing the same souls, the same mental capacities, and the same human rights. But compares to male female’s rights are limited in our society. As a feminist Wollstonecraft argues for equality in both sexes. She says that rational education for both children and women is the only way to ensure equality in society. She mounted her campaign for the reform of female education, arguing that girls should be educated in the same subjects and the same method as boys.
                  The first chapter of the treaty, A Vindication of the Rights of Women concerns the rights and duties of mankind. Our experience will prove that by struggling with our passion we attain a degree of knowledge. By emphasizing on ‘reason’ she states that the perfection of our nature and capability of happiness are based on reason, virtue and knowledge.  Through her observation she finds out that human prejudices have clouded reason, this prejudice is the main cause for inequality in society. She advises us to engage in independent thinking that will make us practical. In the first chapter she looks entire history and structure based on prejudice rather than reason.  Now we are going to look at our chapter, which is the second chapter of A Vindication of the Rights of Women.
                   
                            FROM A VINDICATION OF THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN
       From chapter 2 -   The prevailing opinion of a sexual character discussed.
                 
                        Second chapter of A Vindication of the Rights of Women is an important one. In this chapter she attempts to make an understanding of prevailing views of the character of women, the political and economic circumstances of eighteenth century women and an analyzing of male writing about women. In this given extracts Wollstonecraft mainly analyzing the famous two works in English literature, Milton’s Paradise Lost and Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Educational work Emilie. She criticizes both works for its disapproval of gender equality and rational education for women.
                         Wollstonecraft begins the extracts by pointing out two incompatible moments in Milton’s Paradise Lost: Adam’s plea to God for an equal and Eve’s birth as an unequal. She questioning Milton’s arguments by asking how is these to be reconciled. She says if God exists and humans are characterized by immortality, then one God fits all, and virtue must be the same in kind, if not in degree, for both sexes. In order to show that male and female are two different thing Milton put it that “he for god only, she for god in him” (585). This statement proves that male considers female as their property into which he can extends his power. He   puts her in a secondary position. The obedience and secondarily expected of women make a mockery of true companionship. In good enlightenment fashion, she comes close to taking the serpent’s role, arguing Eve out of blind obedience and into independent thinking.
                               Through this treaty she opposed the tyranny of mankind. In the patriarchal society women are not allowed to have sufficient strength of mind to acquire virtue. The society referred women as the degraded, oppressed, and politically marginalized one. The stereo type of male society considers women as slave.  Due to sympathy, in this condition of women Wollstonecraft calls her as the “half of the human species.”  She comments that women are not a swarm of ephemeron triflers, then why should they force to live in ignorance under the name of innocence.  Women (Eve) are formed from the ribs of men (men). It represents her inferiority. Taking Eve as the “first frail mother” (586) of human Milton tells that women are formed for innocence, attractive and softness.  Milton considers women as weaker and inferior sex. Here Wollstonecraft mentioning the thought of Islam that women have soul, they denying souls for women.  Patriarchy tries to insult us with domestic brutes.
                        Wollstonecraft finds rational education as a solution for all women’s problem.   Then she makes analyze on all writers who have written on the subject of female education and manners from Rousseau Dr. Gregory.  These writers treat women as artificial and weaker sex. They call her as useless member of society. Only men are the respectable and responsible personalities in the world. Sometimes they forget the role of women in making a respectable family, society and nation.
                     Taking Rousseau’s Emilie, world’s greatest work on education, Wollstonecraft conveys the importance rational education and thinking.  She agrees with him what he wrote about fresh air, exercise, and the natural reason. But she criticizes his differentiation between the educations of Sophie and Emilie.  He limits rational education to boys. Rousseau giving carefully worked out plan for the growth of male children on the basis of education from infancy through adolescence. Emilie’s mind develop through conversation, experiments arranged by the teacher, indeed everything that all help him to use his eyes and his senses and his imagination. As a woman Sophie’s condition is worse. She did not get proper education like Emilie. According to Rousseau women does not rational education like male. Woman should be educated for the pleasure of men. She is merely puppet in the hands of them. Women’s responsibility is to care her husband and nurture her children. So that she needs ‘domestic education’ instead of ‘rational’.
                          In Rousseau’s opinion if a man did attain degree of perfection of mind this body arrived at maturity, it might be proper in order to make man and his wife one that she should be entirely on his understanding.  Not only Rousseau but also the most of the male writers who have followed in his footsteps argued that there is only one aim for female education: to make women pleasing to men:  For example John Gregory’s hand book on proper female behavior, titled A Father’s Legacy to Daughters (1774) women to cultivate ‘virtues’ for the fondness for dress.  She attacks female writers such as Hester Lynch Thrale Piozzi, Mme. de Stel, the celebrated French writer Mme Felicite Genlis as effectively reiterating masculine sentiments.
                    The lack of education makes women as secondary thing and domestic employers.  It makes her as a dependent one. It is important to note that if any where women gets education it is a disorderly kind of education, not the proper one. But the thing is that the little knowledge that the women attain from various circumstances is strong than the knowledge of men.  Wollstonecraft says she acquires this knowledge from observations of real life, than from comparing what has been individually observed with the results of experience generalized by speculation. She also points out that in the present state of society, a little learning is required to support the character of a gentleman; and boys are obliged to submit a few years of discipline. The cultivation of understanding is subordinate in the case of women, which are the disorderly kind of education.
                   Then Wollstonecraft analyses the situation of military officers in order to show gender inequality. The military man sent into the world before their minds have been stored with knowledge or fortified by principles. Continuously with society’s interaction they gains worldly knowledge. Through that knowledge they acquire manners and customs. Soldiers as well as women, practice the minor virtues with punctilious politeness. Both of them get the same education, yet it is rarely found in the army as amongst men are superior to women.  Here people fail to appreciate women’s courage and readiness for working for her nation. Instead they look her through the eyes of weaker sex and it may be a difficult and impossible task for her.  The notion of women are merely zeroes are already cultivated in the minds of patriarchy.  Woman is considered as a playing tool of the house. They are entirely the subject of superior faculties of men.
                        Wollstonecraft examines Rousseau’s declaration that “a woman should never, for a moment feel herself independent” (591). She should be governed by fear to exercise the traditional role of woman, slave for male, an object of desire and a sweeter companion to man whenever he chooses to relax himself. She is an emotionless object in the hands of superior powers.  Men have a great responsibility towards his wife, daughters, and mother.   But they are cruelly neglected, especially the wives.  Whether she is loved or neglected, her first wish should be to make her respectable.
                                   Wollstonecraft put forward a national education system as the solution for women’s suffrage.  She argues for rational education for both sexes. This argument is based on the promise of freedom enthusiastically greeted by   many English writers in the early days of French revolution.  She says not only men, but women have the gift of reason, and no authority has the right to question women’s right.  The rights of women must be respected.  Education is necessary for women.  If she be not prepared by the education to become the companion of man, her progress of knowledge and virtue will be stop there.
                             Rational education is necessary in married life for the mutual understanding of the partners. Youth is the season for love in both sexes.   She says men and women should be educated in a great degree, she also adds that she does not believe in the private education. Men appear to her in no philosophical manner when he tries to secure the conduct of women by keeping them in a state of childhood.  In her opinion the most perfect education is the exercise of the understanding as is best calculated to strengthen the body.  It helps the individual to attain habits of virtue and manner. How to attain virtue is her main concern.
                              This essay is a response to the educational and political theorist in the eighteenth century who did not believe and propagate women’s education. Education is primary for women in order to increase her political and social position.  Apart from her husband’s identity education will give her a self identity.  In the eighteenth century women are prevented from becoming friends and partners to their husband for the management of domestic duties or the education of their children. Women are essential to the nation because they educate its children and mother is the first teacher of her child. The lesson that she teach to her children will be influence his character formation. And also education will change her as a better companion to her husband rather than mere wife.
                          Mary Wollstonecraft argued for educational reforms. In her plan for national education system she advocates for universal primary education for children and civil and political rights for adults. Government should be establish “day school” for both male and female children and teach them the same lesson.   In her opinion private education will not solve the overall problem.  The private education degrades women. Men are encouraged to exercise their thought in relation to the past and future, as well as the present. But the women are allowed to focus only on the present and it increases their dependence on man.
                  The national education system itself plays a fundamental role in women’s right.  Education is the best way for attaining virtues and manners.   By being educated together with boys girl will learn to become free and independent.  Education helps us to strengthen both our mind and body. Education and freedom will not be make women as masculine, instead it make her more responsible.  Mary Wollstonecraft is a respectful figure in the minds of today’s women also and her advocacy for women’s freedom and equality is remarkable one.
                      
                         
                                          BIBLIOGRAPHY
Primary Source:
Ø Leitch, Vincent B. (Ed). The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Newyork: Norton, 2001. 586-593. Web.
Secondary sources:
Ø Habib, M. A.R. A History of Literary criticism: from Plato to the Present. Newdelhi:  Blackwell, 2006. Print.
Ø Johnson, Nancy E. “Wollstonecraft and Godwin: Dialogues”. Pamela Client (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s. Newyork: Cambridge, 2011. 101-115. Print.
Ø Mellor, Anne K. “Mary Wollstonecraft’s A vindication of the Rights of Women and the women writers of her day”. Claudia L. Johnson (Ed.), the Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. UK: Cambridge, 2002.141- 159. Print. 
Ø  Rendall, Jane. “Wollstonecraft, Vindications and Historical and Moral View of the French Revolution.” Pamela Client (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to British Literature of the French Revolution in the 1790s. Newyork: Cambridge, 2011. 71-85. Print.
Ø Alan, Richardson. “Mary Wollstonecraft on education”. Claudia L. Johnson (Ed.), the Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. UK: Cambridge, 2002. 24-41. Print.
       













No comments:

Post a Comment