Tuesday, 20 October 2015

A-3, Enlightenment Philosophy

ASSIGNMENT

“ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY”


MITHYA A
LCL051511



INTRODUCTION

Unique but popular collective ideas are always the characteristic of every society whether past or present. Literature also contributes to the change in society and perceive people’s mind. In English specific year span constitutes the changes in literature. Such a way here the topic of discussion is “Enlightenment philosophy” along with its previous period, neoclassical age and later period romantic age. Enlightenment is an eighteenth century movement in arts and science which gives importance to reason. So it is break up from tradition and conventions, people began to think beyond religion. It is positive sign that rational thinking dominated the age.
The major features of Enlightenment philosophy were rationalism, empiricism which is based on experience, pragmatism or practical thinking and utilitarianism. Enlightenment was freeing humanity from its earlier belief on mere authority and unexamined tradition. Enlightenment period is also known as “age of reason” even though there is different views regarding reason among various thinkers. In political and economic contexts enlightenment was the rise of liberalism and the French revolution of 1789, which fostered the discarding the power of king and a shift to bourgeoisie or middle class. Liberalism was the free rational economy protected by technology and science.
            The idea of rationalism is not new to eighteenth century, because Plato and Aristotle too advocated reasoning to acknowledge universal truths. Enlightenment was not a movement restricted to England but French and Dutch thinkers also contributed to the period. René Descartes, a French philosopher put forward the philosophy of rationalism. His concept of “I think, therefore, I am” is popular and influential. There are many other influential thinkers in enlightenment, like Locke, Hume, Diderot, Voltaire etc.
 Before detailing the characteristics of enlightenment, it is necessary to understand what happened in early period. The early period of enlightenment was, Neoclassic. The Neoclassical period constitutes three major phases; Restoration or the age of Dryden, next is Augustan age, the major figure of this period was Pope, and the last phase is Age of Sensibility or Age of Johnson. But it does not mean that in each phase only one literary figure is overruled. There was also many other important writers and thinkers. The authors of these period were exhibited a strong traditionalism which lacked innovation and over emphasis on classical writers. Actually the term “neoclassic” shows that it was revival of classical. The classical writers were the established models in all the major literary genres. The period considered literature as an art, or a set of skills which was perfected by long study and practice. They upheld that human beings are the primary subject matter of the major forms of literature because they are the integral part of social organization.  Human being is the centre of literary works. Two of the central concepts of neoclassical literary theory were “imitation” and “nature” which were intimately related. Imitation implies of the external world and human action and the nature implies collective idea like human nature or harmonious and hierarchical order of the universe etc.
Later as a response to neoclassical and enlightenment emerged the Romantic period. So it is clear that evolution of each period is a kind of response to the former period. Whether enlightenment is a reply to the negatives of neoclassic age or romantic age as a corrective to enlightenment, the process of changes in the society and people goes on. A social and political change reflects in the intellectual of people as a result it produced in the literature as well.



NEOCLASSICAL PERIOD
The neoclassical age begins in the early seventeenth century, it ends around 1785. The specific year span is not possible because, sometimes the enlightenment period over laps neoclassical age. It is impossible to give a definition to the period, it may be conflicting. The salient features of neoclassical writings constitute the overall idea of the period. As mentioned earlier, neoclassic was the ‘new’ classic. The thinkers of this period advocated ancient writers of Greece and Rome and their excellence. Neoclassic in a kind, devoted to slavish imitation of the classics. Neoclassicist was the heirs of Renaissance humanists. They implied the separation of prose from poetry. The writers’ indebted to classical age, they emphasized classical values such as objectivity, impersonality, rationality, decorum, balance, harmony, proportion and moderation. Like enlightenment thinkers, neoclassicists also preached the ideals of ‘reason’ but it is different, enlightenment thinkers believed in coercive and oppressive force constituted reason. The neoclassicists believed reason of the classical philosophers.
                        Neoclassicism followed ‘standardization’ in all spheres, but it is impossible to keep strict rules and regulations in creative art. It is also true in that period creativity is somewhat related to the past legacy. The neoclassicists believed that Homer and Vergil already discovered and expressed fundamental laws of nature. The modern writers were obliged to imitate these set of ideas paved by the past. If they did so they can create excellent works, invention was also allowed as a modification of past models. Neo classical criticism first originated in France and then spread to other parts of Europe notably in England. The major figures of French neoclassicism were Corneille, Racine, Moliere and    La Fontaine.  

Pierre Corneille (1606-1684)
Pierre Corneille was the founding figure of neoclassicism in France. His important literary criticism was Trois Discourse sur le Poeme Dramatique (Three Discourse on Dramatic Poetry, 1660). He was criticized for violating three unities in his drama Le Cid, and also Aristotlian perception of probability and necessity and thereby undermined morally didactic function of drama. Corneille agrees with Aristotle’s view but he took liberal interpretation of Aristotle’s three unities and didacticism. Corneille explains that it is easy for critics to be strict in their censure; but if they themselves practice it they will find difficulty behind it. Corneille’s view is that; make ancient rules agree with modern pleasures. He perceives classical views in favour of modern audience. He had the opinion that literature is not merely meant for instruction, but for entertainment too.
                        In England, neoclassicism was inspired by the French example. It was also reaction against French neoclassicism. Neoclassical criticism in England was not so systematic; many saw it as integral part of political state. The major figures of English neoclassicism were Dryden, Pope, Aphra Behn, Samuel Johnson etc.

John Dryden (1631-1700)
Dryden was a nationalist writer. He popularized English nationalist feeling in his writings. Language and literature used for inspiring English people. Dryden also defended English drama against some of the French critics; he advocated that English should have a theory instead of following French dramatic theory. Samuel Johnson termed Dryden “the father of English criticism”. Like Corneille, Dryden attempted to strike a compromise between the claims of ancient authority and the needs of the modern writer. Dryden with his character Neander, supports the observation of Corneille that anyone with actual experience of the stage will see how constraining the classical rules are.
Dryden was against the strict distinction between genres. His text might be viewed as expressing a status of transition between neoclassicism and romanticism. If Dryden is neoclassical, it is in the sense that he acknowledges the classics as having furnished archetypes of drama; but modern writers, he says, are at liberty to create their own literary traditions. Dryden considers poetry as a rational activity with ethical and epistemological responsibility.

Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
Pope’s An Essay on Criticism contains the clearest statement of neoclassical principles in any language. An Essay on Criticism is written in verse. Pope here not only delineates the scope and nature of good literary criticism, but redefines classical virtues in terms of ‘nature’ and ‘wit’ as necessary to both poetry and criticism. Pope had the opinion that best poetry and the best criticism are divinely inspired. He put forward guidelines for a critic, he says, first a critic should recognize overall unity of a work. A critic should also partial in analyzing a work. Finally a critic needs to possess a moral sensibility ad sense of balance. It is clear that these qualities of a good critic are primarily attributes of humanity or moral sensibility rather than aesthetic qualities. Indeed the only specifically aesthetic quality mentioned here is ‘taste’. Pope equates the classical literary and critical traditions with nature, and to sketch a redefined outline f literary history from classical to his own era. Pope insists that rues of nature were merely discovered, not invented by the ancients.

Aphra Behn (1640-1689)
Aphra Behn was one of the founders of English novel. Her novel Oroonko was the first novel against slavery. She was one of the commercial playwrights, because of her circumstances. Aphra Behn sees herself as masculine part of her writing. Her experience as a female playwright exposed her to the numerous obstacles faced by woman in this profession, resulting in her highly unorthodox and controversial views about drama. Corneille appeal to experience rather than classical rules, but Behn appeal to experience, especially female experience. She takes drama basically as a tool of entertainment. Behn was criticized by her male contemporaries. She replies these criticism by saying that if women gets the same education as men, are just as capable of acquiring knowledge and in many capacities as men.  She points out that many works of poetry have treated the subject of women in an indecent fashion, but the offense is overlooked because man wrote them.
                                    Behn’s originality lies as much in the way she speaks; her texts adopt a tone and a style unprecedented in the history of literary criticism.  Behn advocate that virtues of good judgment, critical reading and thinking should be looked beyond the pale of masculine learning and the conventional male literary establishment. She speaks above from these establishments and discards male assumptions about women writers. She says woman’s use the categories of common sense and reason.



Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
Samuel Johnson is renowned for his two -volume Dictionary of the English Language. His most famous poem is The Vanity of Human Wishes, a speculation on the emptiness of worldly pursuits. He also wrote drama and fictional work, The History of Rasselas and essays in periodicals. In his fictional work The History of Rasselas one of the character Imlac’s statements is considered as the summary of neoclassical principles. The business of the poet, says Imlac, is to examine, not the individual, but the species; to remark general properties and large appearances…He is to exhibit in his portraits of nature such prominent and striking features, as recall the original to every mind. Johnson’s classical commitment to reason, truth and probability was complemented by his equally classical insistence on the moral function of literature. Johnson acknowledges that the greatest excellency of art is to imitate nature, but which are most proper for imitation. Johnson was also commented about Shakespeare and his works.  He reaffirms the excellence of Shakespeare’s works and called Shakespeare as the poet of nature.


THE ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY
The common element of enlightenment was a trust in universal and uniform reason as adequate to solve the crucial problems, this rationalism was necessary to overcome darkness of superstition. Enlightenment philosophy is flourished in all the fields like language, literature, art, religion, and political theory.  The enlightenment thinkers considered themselves as initiating an era free from feudal caprice, political absolutism and religious intolerance. The main themes of enlightenment philosophy continued in our present society too. The seminal figures of enlightenment philosophy were Bacon, Descartes, and Spinoza.  The Enlightenment was, at its center, a celebration of ideas – ideas about what the human mind was capable of, and what could be achieved through deliberate action and scientific methodology. Many of the new, enlightened ideas were political in nature. Intellectuals began to consider the possibility that freedom and democracy were the fundamental rights of all people, not gifts bestowed upon them by beneficent monarchs or popes. The Enlightenment was believed to be the realization of the tools and strategies necessary to achieve that potential. The Renaissance was the seed, while the Enlightenment was the blossom. John Locke was the influential figure in enlightenment philosophy. Actually his theory of empiricism bridges a connection between enlightenment philosophy and literary criticism.
                                    The essential beliefs and convictions of Enlightenment thinkers were by and large committed to writing, thus a fairly accurate sketch of the eighteenth century mind is available to historians working in this century. Medieval Christian philosophy acknowledged t that reason was a necessary component of a proper spiritual disposition, but it was only one element needed to be balanced by faith and revelation. What was novel to the enlightenment was its insistence on reason a as the primary faculty through which we could acquire knowledge. The faith of the Enlightenment is that the process of enlightenment, of becoming progressively self-directed in thought and action through the awakening of one's intellectual powers, leads ultimately to a better, more fulfilled human existence. Enlightenment philosophy tends to stand in tension with established religion, insofar as the release from self-incurred immaturity in this age, daring to think for oneself, awakening one's intellectual powers, generally requires opposing the role of established religion in directing thought and action.
                        Enlightenment thinkers like Locke, Addison, Vico, and Mary Wollstonecraft put forward their new ideas to popularize the period, some of them philosophically contributed to the period, whereas some of them protested against the pre-enlightenment period. The theories like feminism had a root in enlightenment age. Enlightenment is the process of undertaking to think for one self, to employ and rely on one's own intellectual capacities in determining what to believe and how to act. Enlightenment philosophers from across the geographical and temporal spectrum tend to have a great deal of confidence in humanity's intellectual powers, both to achieve systematic knowledge of nature and to serve as an authoritative guide in practical life. So in later period also these thinkers were influential. Apart from renaissance period quest for scientific knowledge predominated in the enlightenment period too.  Let us discuss about the major enlightenment figures, such as John Locke, Joseph Addison etc.

John Locke (1632-1704)
John Locke is the founding father of British Empiricism, and his thought is often characterized by tolerance, moderation and common sense. Locke’s philosophy is still having a position in our mind, empiricism or arriving at truth through sensations is the principle idea of Locke, we too participating in judgment of a thing through experience. Locke suggested that use of language in a precise way will reduce unnecessary confusion in our concepts. He opines that language is closely connected with thought process so the correct use of language is necessary.  Locke revives the age-old antagonism between philosophy and poetry. He sees poetry as the realm of imagination where as philosophy was the absolute and clear judgment and urge to further knowledge. The former, that is poetry, creates confusion and conflation, while the latter, philosophy, tended towards clarity. He goes on detailing the difference between poetry and philosophy, saying one is figurative language and other is the language of reality etc. Locke defines language as a “instrument of knowledge” so here the emphasis on language shows Locke’s concern about language. He says that the imperfection of words lies in the uncertainty of what they signify. 
                                                Locke had an opinion that a standardized dictionary of all language will clear all controversies of the period. Locke’s voice is perhaps the most pronounced sign of the bourgeois refashioning of language into a utilitarian instrument. Locke was more conscious about language and its criticism. Locke is some extent similar in the views of Plato. He emphasizes that ‘general’ and ‘universal’ do not belong to the real existence or things in themselves but it is merely the creation of human mind. Locke denies the idea of real essence; he says everything is purely verbal essence or existed in words. For Locke, nature represents everything through our thought process we create assumptions and ultimately expresses through the medium of language.

Joseph Addison (1672-1719)
Joseph Addison with his friend Richard Steele authored a series of article in the periodicals The Tattler and The Spectator. Like Plato, Addison is concerned with how a literary work affects its reader, though unlike Plato he is less concerned with the moral effect of a poem, than with its aesthetic effect; he is interested more in how a poem ‘delights’ than in how, or what, it ‘instructs’. Following the mental philosophy of John Locke, Addison describes two kinds of pleasure in imagination. Primary pleasure comes from the immediate experience of objects through sensory perception; secondary pleasure comes from the experience of ideas, from the presentation of objects (in words or picture) when those objects are not present. He distinguishes the powers of the imagination from the powers of reason, noting that while reason investigates the cause of things, imagination is content with experiencing them, either directly or through representations. Addison agrees with Sidney and Bacon that art is not just an imitation of nature, but an improvement on or completion of it.
                                    In the periodicals Steele and Addison addresses many issues of that period. The topics of their writing were nature tragedy, wit, genius, the sublime, and the imagination. Steele referred to his age as a corrupt age, devoted to luxury, wealth and ambition not the virtues of good will and friendship etc. Addison and Steele generally advocate following nature, reason and practice of ancients. But these notions are contradictory to enlightenment philosophy. Not only that their views resemble the neoclassical philosophy. Their periodicals brought to the public sphere so the topics of discussion bring among the society and people. They created fictional but familiar realistic characters which later influenced the novels, and Addison also contributed to the development of essay form.


Giambattista Vico (1668-1744)
Vico’s major work was New Science first He published in 1725. He articulated a historical view of the progress of human thought, language and culture that anticipates the evolutionary perspectives of Hegel, Marx and others. Vico included in a group of intellectuals who reacted against central tenets of medieval philosophy and they supported enlightenment rationalist and empiricist thinking. He urges that “new science” must be rational civil theology of divine providence. Vico’s insights into poetry form an integral part of his attempts to explain the origins and development of human society. Vico sees the progression of wisdom or knowledge as moving from the senses through reason to revelation.  Vico categorized the periods in literature as period of “gods” and the next is period of “heroes” and the last period is period of “men”. Vico attributes two important historical functions of poetry; first one is what he calls “poetic wisdom” it was founded in religious and civil institutions of primitive people. Next is, poetry provided the embryonic basis for all further learning.

David Hume (1711-1776)
David Hume was one of the major figures of the enlightenment philosophy. Hume stress the idea that rule of art is not an established setting, experience is the basis for judging a work. True taste according to Hume, is a rational process. Reasoning helps us to set up the overall idea of a text and its uniformity. Hume says poetry is nothing but a chain of propositions and reasoning. The poet himself need taste invention as well as judgment. The standard of taste according to Hume is subjective and restricted qualified people. In attempting to rescue artistic taste from mere subjectivism, Hume appeals to a number of factors, all of which are based on experience.

Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797)
            Mary Wollstonecraft is more popular as feminist writer rather than enlightenment philosopher. She was very much influenced by the French Revolution of 1789. Wollstonecraft has rightly been characterized as an enlightenment thinker, propounding argument in favour of reason and spoke against hereditary privilege and the inequitable apparatus of feudalism. Wollstonecraft apart from the conventional enlightenment elements, showed concern for the economic and educational rights of women, expressed in her best known work A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In this work, she addresses to the issues that have remained crucial to much feminist criticism. Her central argument is that if woman be not prepared by education to become the companion of man, she will stop the progress of knowledge and virtue; for truth must be common to all.
Wollstonecraft’s two central ideas are that not only men but also women have the ‘gift of reason’ and secondly, no authority can simply coerce women into fulfilling a given set of duties. What she is essentially appealing to are the enlightenment principles of reason, duty, freedom, self-determination and even patriotism; her feminism consists in the demand that these same principles extend to women. Wollstonecraft recommends national day schools which will be free to all classes of society, and where both sexes will be educated together. She also had a national feeling that of Dryden. She says these national schools cultivate friendship and love between boys and girls. Mary Wollstonecraft is the female representation of enlightenment society as well as philosophy, because she views enlightenment in the eyes of a woman, not the literary figure. So her principles paves base for the development of enlightenment period’s woman. Later her views are interpreted as feminist, but largely she is the represent of woman in the enlightenment philosophy.

CONCLUSION
Enlightenment period created many thinkers and theories. Rationalism is the predominated theory of this age. But reasoning is differing to each thinker. There are no well established models or ideology is prevalent in this period. All the ideas of each philosophers and writers were collectively characterized under the term ‘enlightenment’. The above discussed writers are not the only pioneers of the period; there are also seminal figures like Kant and Hegel. Both philosophers contributed to the theory of aestheticism. Kant further contributed to “art for art’s sake” in his philosophies, later his philosophy is largely influenced the period, romanticism. Kant said that literature is autonomous and there are no purposes beyond it, and pleasure is the primary aim in literature.  Hegel initially inspired by French Revolution. Hegel’s thoughts affect two major currents of European intellectual and social history, the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Hegel is stressing the supreme idea of reason and the doctrine of empiricism.
                                    From the over emphasis to rationalism and other objective analysis, the enlightenment period give way to highly imaginative and subjective period, a period of transition. The romantic period preached the glory of past life, a kind of nostalgia, rational thinking discarded in the period. The enlightenment thinkers had although humanitarian, intellectual and progressive outlook, but they tried to subjugate both external world of nature and human self. Actually romantic period was a meant to free these shackles of subjugation. Enlightenment tried to make progressive individual, free from superstitions and prejudices and also politically to remove feudal absolutism and religious intolerance. They are successful in their mission. But it also reduced creative writing of the period. There are many theories and philosophies predominated in the enlightenment period, but the numbers of artistic and imaginative works are less than previous period.
                                    It was in the fields of philosophy and literature that Romanticism as a broad response to Enlightenment, Neoclassical and French Revolutionary ideals, initially took root. Romantic view of literature was an intense individualism based on authority of experience and often democratic orientation, as well as optimistic and sometimes utopian belief in progress. Romanticism shared enlightenment notion of possibility of human achievement and conception of human nature as good etc. So at an extend Romanticism was response to Enlightenment and other previous stage, at another hand romanticism took inspiration from enlightenment.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
·         Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Wadsworth: Cengage, 2012. Print
·         Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary Criticism: From Plato to the Present. New Delhi: Blackwell, 2006. Print
·         Habib, M. A. R. Literary Criticism from Plato to the Present: AN INTRODUCTION. Singapore: Blckwell, 2011.Print 
·         Klages, Mary. Literary Theory: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Continuum, 2006. Print


















ASSIGNMENT 3 - ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY


       ASSIGNMENT ON ENLIGHTENMENT
                             PHILOSOPHY
          
SUJITHA.M
LCL051521
               
                                INTRODUCTION

                                 Neoclassicism refers to the period between 1600 and 1785 in English literature.  There are many sub periods or sub division between the neoclassical ages. The period between 1660 and 1700 is known as “restoration period”.  Then the “Augustan age” started which extends from 1700 to 1745. “Augustan age” followed the “age of sensibility” or “age of Johnson” (1745 to 1785). Now we are going to look it detailed.
                           The restoration period takes its name from the restoration of the Stuart king Charles second to the English throne in 1660, at the end of commonwealth; it is specified as lasting until 1700. The literature produced during this age reflects the urbanity, wit, and licentiousness of the life centering on the court. Another feature is that the theaters came back more powerfully.  Sir George Etherege, William Wycherley, William Congreve and John Dryden developed the distinctive comedy of manners called “Restoration comedy”. Dryden was the major critic and poet as well as major dramatist of the age. Dryden, Thomas Otway, and other playwrights developed the distinctive form of tragedy called “heroic drama”. Like Dryden one of the notable personalities of the age is Aphra Ben, the first Englishwoman to earn her living by her pen and one of the most inventive authors of the age.
                        After restoration the Augustan age started. This period is also known as “age of Queene Anne. It is quite true that the twelve years of Queene Anne’s reign saw the most famous authors of their generation come to full maturity.  The original Augustan age was the brilliant literary period of Virgil, Horace, and Ovid under the Roman Emperor Augustus (27 BC- AD 14). In the eighteenth century and later, however, the term was also applied to the literary period in England from 1700-1745. The leading writers of the age were Alexander Pope, Jonathan swift, and Joseph Addison. They imitated the literary forms and subjects of the classic age.
                     Augustan age followed the age of Sensibility.  It denote the period between the death of Alexander pope in 1744, and 1785, which was one year after the death of Samuel Johnson and one year before  Robert Burns’ poems, Chiefly in Scottish Dialect. The half century of the period is known as the “Age of Johnson”, stresses the dominant position of Samuel Johnson and his literary and intellectual circle, which included Oliver Goldsmith, Edmund Burke, James Boswell, Edward Gibbon, and Hester Lynch Thrale. These authors on the whole represented a culmination of the literary and critical modes of neoclassicism and the world view of enlightenment.
                The Enlightenment sometimes referred as the age of reason.  It was a confluence of ideas and activities that took place throughout the eighteenth century Western Europe, England, and the American colonies.  The common feature of enlightenment is the belief in human reason. The enlightenment thinkers believe or try to prove that “reason” replace the darkness of superstition, prejudice and barbarity.  Thinkers believed in advances of scientific and industrial development. Reason was the inductive procedure of science. The famous enlightenment thinkers are Francis Bacon, John Locke, William Godwin, Descartes, Voltaire, Immanuel Kant, David Hume, Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft etc.
                             The age of enlightenment and the enlightenment thinker’s views are a turning point in the history of the world. Enlightenment age changed the outlook of the world entirely.  So here I am going to do an assignment on the topic “enlightenment philosophy”.  The following pages contain details regarding neoclassical literary criticism and enlightenment criticism. It also contains major personalities of the age and their critical view.

             NEOCLASSICAL LITERARY CRITICISM
                  Neoclassicism refers to a broad tendency in literature and art enduring from early seventeenth century until around 1750. Neoclassical age is also known as “age of Queene Anne” or “Augustan age”.  Politically, Augustanism refers to the parallels drawn between the emerging structures of English society and those existing in the period of Emperor Augustus in ancient Rome. These parallels were worked out in terms of political similarities and the closeness evident in some kind of cultural conditioning in contemporary England. The process of finding similarities between Augustan periods in ancient Rome and English society began in the early seventeenth century, when writers like Ben Jonson eluded the possibility.
                         Neoclassicism calls for return to the classical models (writings of Horace and Virgil etc), literary styles, and values of ancient Greek and Roman authors. Neoclassicists were to some extent heirs of the Renaissance humanists. Compared to Renaissance humanists, neoclassicists were less ambiguous in their emphasis upon classical values of objectivity, impersonality, rationality, decorum, balance, harmony, proportion, and moderation.  Two of the concepts central to neoclassical literary criticism and practice were imitation and nature. They were closely related. In one sense the notion of imitation of the external world and, primarily, of human action was a reaffirmation of the ideals of objectivity and impersonality. But it also referred to the imitation of classical models, especially of Homer and Virgil. The major critics of the neoclassical age are Corneille, Nicolas Boileau-Despreaux in France Dryden, pope, Aphra Ben and Johnson in England.
 PIERRE CORNEILLE (1606-1684)
                Neoclassical criticism first took root in France .From France it spread to other part of Europe especially England. The major figures of French neoclassicism were Corneille, Racine, Moliere and La Fontain.  Corneille’s theories grew out of the need to defend his dramatic practice against classicists such as Scudery and Jean Chaplin.
                    Corneille born in Normandy and he was primarily a playwright. The most important text of his literary criticism, Trois Discours sur le poeme dramatique (Three Discourses on      Dramatic poetry, 1660), was produced in response to the controversies had ignited, to explain justify his own dramatic practice. These controversies are aroused from his most renowned play Le Cid appeared in 1637. It was not only attacked by the critic but the French literary and political establishment for its failure to observe the rules of classical theater lay down by Aristotle and Horace. The play violated the classical unities of action time and place and also Aristotle’s concept of probability and necessity.  Corneille responded to these charges both by writing further plays displaying his mastery of classical convention and by producing his Three Discourses.  In his third Discourse, entitled “Of Three Unities of Action, Time and Place,Corneille attempts to explain the rational thinking behind his play. Corneille’s desire is to make ancient rules agrees with modern pleasure. He put forward constant experience, actual practice. He appeals not only to a broader vision of Aristotelian probability and necessity but also to other aesthetic criteria such as beauty, comprehensiveness, and unity.  His text is an example of ancient authority and an appeal to experience and theatrical practice.
JOHN DRYDEN (1631-1700)
                    Samuel Johnson called Dryden “the father of English criticism” and praised his Essay of Dramatic Poesy (1668) by claiming that “modern English prose begins here.” Dryden’s critical work was extensive, treating of various genres such as epic, tragedy, comedy and dramatic theory, satire, the relative virtues of ancient and modern writers as well as the nature of poetry and translation. His Essay of Dramatic Poesy is written as a debate on drama conducted by four speakers, Euginius, Crites, Lisiedius, and Neander. The first of these debates is between ancient and modern. Dryden’s Essay is an important intervention in this debate, perhaps marking a distinction between Renaissance and neoclassical values. Like Tasso and Corneille Dryden attempted to strike a compromise between the claims of ancient authority and the exigencies of the modern writer. He speaks about how or in what sense French writers become more popular than the English.  He advocated that English should have a theory instead following French dramatic theory. Dryden considers poetry as a rational activity.
ALEXANDER POPE (1688-1744)
                       Pope’s An Essay on Criticism is generally considered as the clearest statement of neoclassical principles in any language. This work published anonymously in 1711, and explains Roman Catholic outlook with classical aesthetic principles and with deism. Pope written his An Essay on Criticism in verse and it is followed the tradition of Horace’s Ars Poetica. He defines classical values in terms of “nature” and “wit”. Both are necessary for good poetry and criticism. Pope calls for “return to nature”. “Nature” and “wit” both are necessary for poetry and criticism. A good poetry and criticism are divinely inspired. He gives advice for the critics to recognize the overall unity of a work.  A critic needs moral sensibility and a sense of balance in order to criticize a work of art.
APHRA BEHN (1640-1689)
                Aphra Behn was one of the first commercial women writers of the age. She is a victim of gender biases and also an important feminist personality of the neoclassical age.  Her function as a poet in society is masculine. She is one of the founders of English novel and her first novel Oroonoko (1688) is an opposition about slavery. She defends the value of drama by contrasting it favorably with traditional learning as thought in the universities.  The French playwright Corneille appeals to experience rather than classical rules but as a feminist Behn appeal to experience female experience.  In her opinion drama is for entertainment.  The male writers of her age criticized her writings but she responded.  She comments that equality in society is only possible through female education. The male writers of her age treated women as indecent in literature. So she found female education as a solution for these attitudes of males.
SAMUEL JOHNSON (1709-1784)
                    Samuel Johnson is remembered for his two- volume Dictionary of the English Language published in 1755 and Lives of the English Poets (1783).  An integral dimension of Johnson’s literary output and personality was his literary criticism, which was to have a huge impact on English letters.  In his Preface to Shakespeare he criticizes Shakespeare for his violation of three unities put forward by Aristotle. Shakespeare’s character’s represents general manners or nature rather than particular. As a neoclassicist Johnson made frequent comparison between past and present works. He concluded that past works are better than the present.
           Johnson’s classical commitment to reason, probability, and truth was complimented by his equally classical insistence on the moral function of literature.   Through his criticism he tries to prove that he is flexible in his adherence to classical formulations. Johnson stresses on “truth”.  According to him truth is superior to rule.  Johnson’s criticism rested on the classical foundation of adherence to nature, reason and truth. Through the term “nature” he not only means the external world and physical nature but the human nature in its universal and historical embodiment of reason and moral sensibility.
                        
                              ENLIGHTENMENT
                   Enlightenment is an intellectual movement and cultural ambiance which developed in Western Europe during the seventeenth century and reached its height during the eighteenth century. According to Immanuel Kant enlightenment is the liberation of man from his self imposed minority. Scientific rationalism or scientific method was the hallmark of enlightenment. Enlightenment age is also known as “age of reason”. The enlightenment thinkers were by no means uniform in their outlook, but in general they saw themselves as an initiating an era of humanitarian, intellectual, and social progress, underlain by the increasing ability of human reason to subjugate analytically both the external world of nature and the human self. Enlightenment replaced superstition and prejudice of the society. Enlightenment thought was integral to the rise of liberalism and the ascendancy to power of the bourgeois class through the French revolution of 1789 and subsequent revolutions throughout Europe.
                     Francis Bacon and Isaac Newton are frequently mentioned as the progenitors of enlightenment.  Bacon worked in the realm of ideas and language, Newton, the author of Principia was a pure scientist in the modern sense.  Bacon in his work The Advancement of learning (1605) and The New Organon (1620) formulated the method of induction in which ideas are generalize on the basis of actual observation.  Enlightenment thinkers believe or only approved scientific rational thinking. Reality is the only truth. They denied deductive observation.
               Rene Descartes is often called the “father” of modern philosophy. Like Bacon he challenged the basic principles of modern philosophy. In his Discourse on Method he began a skeptical mode of thinking and started to doubt everything until he came to the recognition that his mere process of thought proved his own existence (“I think, therefore I am”).  He also states that never to receive anything as truth until to prove it as truth. Descartes’ single most influential legacy was his philosophy of Dualism. God created two kinds of reality- mind and matter. Mind belonged to man alone and all else was matter. Bacon and Descartes represent what were to become two important strands of enlightenment thought, empiricism and rationalism respectively. Montesquieu, Voltaire, David Hume, Edward Gibbon, Thomas Hobbes and Rousseau are the major political enlightenment figures of the age.  In Europe, Voltaire and Rousseau were the torch bearers of enlightenment literature and philosophy. Latter was a strong advocate for social and reform of all kinds. During this period English literary field also witnessed progress. Tolerance of the religious matter is the central theme of enlightenment literature. Richardson’s Pamela, Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, and Henry Fielding’s Shamela are the products of enlightenment. 
                      The historical and intellectual developments associated with enlightenment had far-reaching effects on literary criticism in terms of the discussion of the language of poetry, notion of taste, and faculties such as wit, judgment, and imagination.  The increasing power of the bourgeoisie, decline of the clergy and nobility, development of constitutional form of development, the increasing power of scientific perspectives, and the development of rationalism and empiricism are the result of enlightenment. 
                    A very direct connection between enlightenment philosophy and literary criticism occurs through the various philosophies of language.  The most important of these theories of language was formulated by John Locke.
JOHN LOCKE (1632-1704)
                As an enlightenment writer Locke’s philosophy has widespread influence. It was Locke who laid the foundations of British Empiricism. Tolerance, moderation and commonsense are the characteristics of his philosophical thinking. His important works are Essay concerning Human Understanding, Two Treatises on Government, Thoughts on Education, and Letters Concerning Tolerations. His philosophy is known as “Tabularasa” which means blank states. He says that mind at birth is blank state upon which experiences would write.  He considers experience as the beginning of knowledge.  Like Hobbes he also put forward social contract theory. In his “state of nature” there was no effective means to enforce natural laws hence arouse the need to setup government. Thus the government was the product of contract and its basis was the concern of people. Thus the king has to operate within the framework of a ‘rule of law’. He clearly analyses the duties of the king and rejects ‘divine right theory’ of divine kingship. He says a king become only the king becomes the support of citizen. Lockian empiricism denied ‘abstract ideas’ claiming that all ideas are concrete.
JOSEPH ADDISON (1672-1719)
            Addison was best known as a poet, dramatist and essayist. He contributed much to the development eighteenth century essay as a literary form.  With the collaboration of his friend Richard Steele he published number of essay in the periodicals such as “tattler” and “spectator”. It was his great ambition to bring philosophical, political and literary discussion within the reach of the middle classes.  Their essay is an attempt to probe the truth of thing, in a dramatic and witty manner for the moral enlightenment of the readers. Both of them used their periodicals for literary, moral and educational purposes.
        Addison is highly influenced by the thoughts of classical writers such as Aristotle and Longinus and also Milton.  Like the psychology by Locke they also made use of more recent observation. Steele calls his age as “corrupt age” concentrating more on luxury and wealth rather than the virtues of friendship and innocence.  In Spectator there are many essays dealing with literary critical issues such as nature of tragedy, wit, genius, and sublime. Like Pope he also attempted to distinguish true and false wit.  Addison finds Dryden’s definition of wit as “a propriety of words and thoughts adapted to the subjects” to be broad; it is possible to apply all writing not only to wit. On the basis of Locke’s definition of wit Addison produced a definition of false wit. True wit consists in the resemblance and congruity of ideas whereas false wit is based on single letters. By holding the values of classical age both Steele and Addison tries to cultivate moral values among the people.
GIAMBATTISTA VICO (1668-1744)
             As an Italian philosopher Vico expressed the historic view of the progress of human thought, language, and culture in his writings. In his major work Scienza Nuova (New Science) he views human nature not as timeless and unchanging but as produced by specific social, religious, and economic circumstances. He made number of speeches on human education.  The purpose of his work is to study the nature of nation based on divine providence. He says that philosophers must ready to spend their time to study the nature which having been made by the god. He rejects Hegel’s notion that is human history is a random or blind series of events. He states the true knowledge teach the knowledge of divine institutions in order to conduct human institutions to the highest good. In short his “science” is the study of mankind. His vision of historical progress allows for a mutual accommodation of divine and human agencies. Vico’s thoughts reflect his approval of early stages of enlightenment thinking.
DAVID HUME (1711- 1776)
             David Hume is a Scottish philosopher and one of the major philosophers of the enlightenment. Like Locke he is an empiricist who believes only in concrete ideas. He states that human knowledge originates from his or her experience. His major philosophical works are A Treaties of Human Nature(1740), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding(1748), An Enquiry concerning the principles of morals(1751) and Political Discourses (1752) etc. His works are generally considers as the manifesto of enlightenment.   Hume was influenced by Locke and Newton. He was a skeptic which separated him from those who trying to create a large comprehensive system of thought.                        
                  He considers empiricism as the signature of enlightenment.  He makes a challenge in traditional classical confidence.  He explains the cause and effect relation properly.  He makes a difference between facts and sentiments or matter of facts and matter of values, the former is based on truth and the latter lacks truth. Art is always appreciated on the basis of sentiments and art always had a sort of value judgment. A standard of taste conform one sentiment over another and condemns one over another.  He then talks about how to regulate classical arts and also about qualified and unqualified critics. According to him there are two kinds of taste: - moral taste and aesthetic taste. One is natural and other is cultivable taste. He is one of the notable figures of the enlightenment.  Hume’s essay On the Standard of Tastes raises questions about the standards of aesthetic judgment.

  MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT (1759-1797)
                         Mary Wollstonecraft acknowledged as the one of the first feminist writers of modern times known as the “mother of Western feminism”.  She was a radical thinker and her central notions were formulated from the French revolution in 1789.  Her first major work A Vindication of the Rights of Man (1790) was a response to Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790).  Then her A Vindication of the rights of Woman (1792) is considers as the founding text or manifesto of western feminism.  In this treaty she advocates for social and moral equality.  She augmented for rational education for both sexes was based on the promise of freedom greeted by the early writers.
                She has rightly been characterized as an enlightenment thinker, propounding arguments in favor of reason.  Through her works she response against enslavement of women due to the lack of education. She criticizes Rousseau’s Emilie for its treatment of male education as superior to female.   Equating female with military men she tries to change the women stereotype as domestic workers.   According to her national education is necessary to women for the future development of a nation.
                                                   CONCLUSION
                   From this assignment on the topic “enlightenment” philosophy we can understand that neoclassical age in English literature followed the age of Enlightenment. Age of Enlightenment is also known as age of reason and it is an idea of progress. The eighteenth century enlightenment philosophy gave a new outlook for the world. Rationalism, Empiricism, ideas and observation these are the key terms related to enlightenment philosophy. We can consider scientific rationalism and scientific method as the hallmark of enlightenment.
              The enlightenment philosophers believed in the realization of truth based on experimentation. The renaissance was the seed behind the blossom of enlightenment. They consider reason as more valuable thing than religion. It is a revolt against religion and church historiography. They stress on the need for history. Thinkers valued individual dignity and advocated both personal freedom and liberation of mind.
                 The period of enlightenment followed the age of romanticism which begins from 1785 or alternatively in 1789, the outbreak of French revolution or in 1798, the publication of Lyrical Ballads by Coleridge and Wordsworth and it ends 1832 the year in which Walter Scott died. Imagination is the key concept of romanticism. It is a reaction against 18th century rationalism and 17th century formalism both considered middle age as an age of barbarism. But the romanticist looks middle ages with respect even nostalgia, finding in them a fascination, colorfulness or spiritual depth. They praised middle age as an age of imagination and feeling of popular poetry and art, of rural simplicity and peace.  Romantic period is somewhat similar to that of neoclassical age which calls upon “return to nature”.
               Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was one of the notable figures in both enlightenment and romanticism.  Kant’s account of the role of imagination in an aesthetic judgment laid the foundation for a great deal of romantic theory and literary practice. he defines aesthetic judgment as an ability to judge an object.
                The two thinkers who made much contribution to the romantic period were Rousseau and Herder. Rousseau is known as the “messiah of romantic movement” and also the “father of romantic movement”.  He is the child of enlightenment. Hegel was another literary critic of the age.   In total we can say that romanticism is an opposition against the eighteenth century enlightenment in the sense that latter is based on reason.
                  BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Abrams, M. H.A Glossary of Literary Terms. Wadsworth: Cengage, 2012. Print. 
2. Habib, M. A. R. A History of Literary Criticism: from Plato to the Present. New         Delhi: Blackwell, 2006. Print.
3. Habib, M. A. R. Literary Criticism from Plato to the Present: An Introduction.          Singapore: Blackwell, 2011. Print.
4.  Klages, Mony. Literary Theory: A Guide to the Perplexed. Newyork: Continuum, 2006. Print.
5. Wimsatt K, William and Cleanth Brooks. Literary criticism: A Short History. New Delhi: Oxford. 1957. Print.











Monday, 19 October 2015

                                          
ASSIGNMENT 3                                                      PREPARED BY: SHEHIN TV
ENLIGHTENMENT PHILOSOPHY
INTRODUCTION
The Enlightenment, known in French as the ‘’Siècle des Lumières’’ (Century of Enlightenment), and in German as the ‘’Aufklärung’’, was a philosophical movement which dominated the world of ideas in Europe in the 18th century. The main goals of Enlightenment thinkers were liberty, progress, reason, tolerance, and ending the abuses of the church and state. The People of Enlightenment believed the almightiness of human knowledge and defied the tradition and the pre-established thoughts of the past. This is the period in which the humans became preoccupied in the human Reason and rationality. Philosophers and Scientists committed the fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantiam. Anything which cannot be understood by rational knowledge and the current status of sciences was reckoned  meaningless or superstitious. Philosophy became very popular among the intellectuals and people read philosophical opera. Enabled by the Scientific Revolution, which had begun as early as 1500, the Enlightenment represented about as big of a departure as possible from the Middle Ages—the period in European history lasting from roughly the fifth century to the fifteenth. The millennium of the Middle Ages had been marked by unwavering religious devotion and unfathomable cruelty. Rarely before or after did the Church have as much power as it did during those thousand years. With the Holy Roman Empire as a foundation, missions such as the Crusades and Inquisition were conducted in part to find and persecute heretics, often with torture and death. Although standard at the time, such harsh injustices would eventually offend and scare Europeans into change. Science, though encouraged in the late Middle Ages as a form of piety and appreciation of God’s bounties, was frequently considered as heresy, and those who tried to explain miracles and other matters of religion faced harsh prosecution. Society was highly hierarchical, with serfdom a rampant practice. There were no mandates regarding personal liberties or rights, and many Europeans feared religion—either at the hands of an unmerciful God or at the hands of the sometimes rash Church itself.
French historians traditionally place the Enlightenment between 1715, the year that Louis XIV died, and 1789, the beginning of the French Revolution. Some recent historians begin the period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution. The Philosophes, the French term for the philosophers of the period, widely circulated their ideas through meetings at scientific academies, Masonic lodges, literary salons and coffee houses, and through printed books and pamphlets. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the monarchy and the church, and prepared the way for the revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including liberalism and neo-classicism, attribute their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.

PHILOSOPHY

In the mid-18th century, Paris became the center of an explosion of philosophic and scientific activity challenging traditional doctrines and philosophies. The philosophic movement was led by Voltaire and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who stood for a society based upon reason rather than faith and Catholic doctrine, for a new civil order based on natural law, and for science based on experiments and observation. The political philosopher Montesquieu introduced the idea of a separation of powers in a government, a concept which was enthusiastically adopted by the authors of the United States Constitution. While the Philosophes of the French Enlightenment were not revolutionaries, and many were members of the nobility, their ideas played an important part in undermining the validity of the Old Regime and shaping the French Revolution.
According to Jonathan Israel, there were two distinct lines of Enlightenment thought: Firstly the radical enlightenment, largely inspired by the one-substance philosophy of Spinoza, which in its political form adhered to: "democracy; racial and sexual equality; individual liberty of lifestyle; full freedom of thought, expression, and the press; eradication of religious authority from the legislative process and education; and full separation of church and state". Secondly the moderate enlightenment, which in a number of different philosophical systems, like those in the writings of Descartes, John Locke, Isaac Newton or Christian Wolff, expressed some support for critical review and renewal of the old modes of thought, but in other parts sought reform and accommodation with the old systems of power and faith. Both lines of thought were opposed by the conservative Counter-Enlightenment, encompassing those thinkers who held on to the traditional belief-based systems of thought.
Francis Hutcheson, a moral philosopher, described the utilitarian and consequentialist principle that virtue is that which provides, in his words, "the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers". Much of what is incorporated in the scientific method (the nature of knowledge, evidence, experience, and causation) and some modern attitudes towards the relationship between science and religion were developed by his protégés David Hume and Adam Smith. Hume became a major figure in the skeptical philosophical and empiricist traditions of philosophy.

Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) tried to balance rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom and political authority, as well as map out a view of the public sphere through private and public reason. Kant's work continued to shape German thought, and indeed all of European philosophy, well into the 20th century. Mary Wollstonecraft was one of England's earliest feminist philosophers. She argued for a society based on reason, and that women, as well as men, should be treated as rational and sensible beings. She is best known for her work A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1791).

SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION
A gradual evolution of thought and approaches to the study of the universe that took place from approximately 1500 to 1700 and paved the way for the Enlightenment. Coming from humble beginnings with basic observations, the Scientific Revolution grew to a fever pitch when scientists such as Galileo Galilei,René Descartes, and Johannes Kepler entered the scene and essentially rewrote history, refuting Church doctrines, explaining religious “miracles,” and setting the world straight on all sorts of scientific principles. The result was not only new human knowledge but also a new perspective on the acquisition of knowledge, such as the scientific method.

POLITICS

The Enlightenment has long been hailed as the foundation of modern Western political and intellectual culture. The Enlightenment brought political modernization to the West, in terms of introducing democratic values and institutions and the creation of modern, liberal democracies.

 

Theories of government

John Locke, one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers, based his governance philosophy in social contract theory, a subject that permeated Enlightenment political thought. The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes ushered in this new debate with his work Leviathan in 1651. Hobbes also developed some of the fundamentals of European liberal thought: the right of the individual; the natural equality of all men; the artificial character of the political order (which led to the later distinction between civil society and the state); the view that all legitimate political power must be "representative" and based on the consent of the people; and a liberal interpretation of law which leaves people free to do whatever the law does not explicitly forbid.
Both Locke and Rousseau developed social contract theories in Two Treatises of Government and Discourse on Inequality, respectively. While quite different works, Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau agreed that a social contract, in which the government’s authority lies in the consent of the governed, is necessary for man to live in civil society. Locke defines the state of nature as a condition in which humans are rational and follow natural law; in which all men are born equal and with the right to life, liberty and property. However, when one citizen breaks the Law of Nature, both the transgressor and the victim enter into a state of war, from which it is virtually impossible to break free. Therefore, Locke said that individuals enter into civil society to protect their natural rights via an “unbiased judge” or common authority, such as courts, to appeal to. Contrastingly, Rousseau's conception relies on the supposition that "civil man" is corrupted, while "natural man" has no want he cannot fulfill himself. Natural man is only taken out of the state of nature when the inequality associated with private property is established. Rousseau said that people join into civil society via the social contract to achieve unity while preserving individual freedom. This is embodied in the sovereignty of the general will, the moral and collective legislative body constituted by citizens.

The French Revolution

The Enlightenment has been frequently associated to the French Revolution of 1789. One view of the political changes that happened during the Enlightenment is that the "consent of the governed" philosophy as stated by Locke in Two Treatises of Government (1689) represented a paradigm shift from the old governance paradigm under feudalism known as the "divine right of kings". In this view, the revolutions of the late 1700s and early 1800s were caused by the fact that this governance paradigm shift often could not be resolved peacefully, and therefore violent revolution was the result. Clearly a governance philosophy where the king was never wrong was in direct conflict with one whereby citizens by natural law had to consent to the acts and rulings of their government.
Alexis de Tocqueville described the French Revolution as the inevitable result of the radical opposition created in the 18th century between the monarchy and the men of letters of the Enlightenment. These men of letters constituted a sort of "substitute aristocracy that was both all-powerful and without real power". This illusory power came from the rise of "public opinion", born when absolutist centralization removed the nobility and the bourgeoisie from the political sphere. The "literary politics" that resulted promoted a discourse of equality and was hence in fundamental opposition to the monarchical rule.

RELIGION

A number of novel ideas about religion developed with the Enlightenment, including Deism and talk of atheism. Deism, according to Thomas Paine, is the simple belief in God the creator, with no reference to the Bible or any other divine source. Instead, the Deist depends solely on personal reason to guide his creed, which was eminently agreeable to many thinkers of the time. Atheism was much discussed, but there were few votaries to it. Wilson and Reill note that, "In fact, very few enlightened intellectuals, even when they were vocal critics of Christianity, were true atheists. Rather, they were critics of orthodox belief, wedded rather to skepticism, deism, vitalism, or perhaps pantheism."Some followed Pierre Bayle and argued that atheists could indeed be moral men. Many others like Voltaire held that without belief in a God who punishes evil, the moral order of society was undermined. That is, since atheists gave themselves to no Supreme Authority and no law, and had no fear of eternal consequences, they were far more likely to disrupt society. Bayle (1647–1706) observed that in his day, "prudent persons will always maintain an appearance of [religion].". He believed that even atheists could hold concepts of honor and go beyond their own self-interest to create and interact in society. Locke said that if there were no God and no divine law, the result would be moral anarchy: every individual “could have no law but his own will, no end but himself. He would be a god to himself, and the satisfaction of his own will the sole measure and end of all his actions”.

Separation of church and state

The "Radical Enlightenment" promoted the concept of separating church and state, an idea that often credited to English philosopher John Locke (1632–1704). According to his principle of the social contract, Locke said that the government lacked authority in the realm of individual conscience, as this was something rational people could not cede to the government for it or others to control. For Locke, this created a natural right in the liberty of conscience, which he said must therefore remain protected from any government authority.

These views on religious tolerance and the importance of individual conscience, along with the social contract, became particularly influential in the American colonies and the drafting of the United States Constitution. Thomas Jefferson called for a "wall of separation between church and state" at the federal level. He previously had supported successful efforts to disestablish the Church of England in Virginia, and authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. Jefferson's political ideals were greatly influenced by the writings of John Locke, Francis Bacon, and Isaac Newton whom he considered the three greatest men that ever lived.
Deism
 Deism is the form of religion most associated with the Enlightenment. According to deism, we can know by the natural light of reason that the universe is created and governed by a supreme intelligence; however, although this supreme being has a plan for creation from the beginning, the being does not interfere with creation; the deist typically rejects miracles and reliance on special revelation as a source of religious doctrine and belief, in favor of the natural light of reason. Thus, a deist typically rejects the divinity of Christ, as repugnant to reason; the deist typically demotes the figure of Jesus from agent of miraculous redemption to extraordinary moral teacher. Deism is the form of religion fitted to the new discoveries in natural science, according to which the cosmos displays an intricate machine-like order; the deists suppose that the supposition of God is necessary as the source or author of this order. Though not a deist himself, Isaac Newton inadvertently encourages deism in his Opticks (1704) by arguing that we must infer from the order and beauty in the world to the existence of an intelligent supreme being as the cause of this order and beauty. Samuel Clarke, perhaps the most important proponent and popularizer of Newtonian philosophy in the early eighteenth century, supplies some of the more developed arguments for the position that the correct exercise of unaided human reason leads inevitably to the well-grounded belief in God. He argues that the Newtonian physical system implies the existence of a transcendent cause, the creator God. In his first set of Boyle lectures, A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God (1705), Clarke presents the metaphysical or “argument a priori” for God's existence. This argument concludes from the rationalist principle that whatever exists must have a sufficient reason or cause of its existence to the existence of a transcendent, necessary being who stands as the cause of the chain of natural causes and effects. Clarke also supports the empirical argument from design, the argument that concludes from the evidence of order in nature to the existence of an intelligent author of that order. In his second set of Boyle lectures, A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion (1706), Clarke argues as well that the moral order revealed to us by our natural reason requires the existence of a divine legislator and an afterlife, in which the supreme being rewards virtue and punishes vice. In his Boyle lectures, Clarke argues directly against the deist philosophy and maintains that what he regards as the one true religion, Christianity, is known as such on the basis of miracles and special revelation; still, Clarke's arguments on the topic of natural religion are some of the best and most widely-known arguments in the period for the general deist position that natural philosophy in a broad sense grounds central doctrines of a universal religion.
Enlightenment deism first arises in England. In On the Reasonableness of Christianity (1695), Locke aims to establish the compatibility of reason and the teachings of Christianity. Though Locke himself is (like Newton, like Clarke) not a deist, the major English deists who follow  are influenced by Locke's work. Voltaire carries deism across the channel to France and advocates for it there over his long literary career. Toward the end-stage, the farcical stage, of the French revolution, Robespierre institutes a form of deism, the so-called “Cult of the Supreme Being”, as the official religion of the French state. Deism plays a role in the founding of the American republic as well. Many of the founding fathers (Jefferson, Franklin, Madison, Paine) author statements or tracts that are sympathetic to deism; and their deistic sympathies influence the place given (or not given) to religion in the new American state that they found.

NATIONAL VARIATIONS

The Enlightenment took hold in most European countries, often with a specific local emphasis. For example, in France it became associated with anti-government and anti-Church radicalism while in Germany it reached deep into the middle classes and where it expressed a spiritualistic and nationalistic tone without threatening governments or established churches. Government responses varied widely. In France, the government was hostile, and the philosophes fought against its censorship, sometimes being imprisoned or hounded into exile. The British government for the most part ignored the Enlightenment's leaders in England and Scotland, although it did give Isaac Newton a knighthood and a very lucrative government office.
In the Scottish Enlightenment, Scotland's major cities created an intellectual infrastructure of mutually supporting institutions such as universities, reading societies, libraries, periodicals, museums and masonic lodges. The Scottish network was "predominantly liberal Calvinist,
 Newtonian, and 'design' oriented in character which played a major role in the further development of the transatlantic Enlightenment". In France, Voltaire said "we look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilization." The focus of the Scottish Enlightenment ranged from intellectual and economic matters to the specifically scientific as in the work of William Cullen, physician and chemist; James Anderson, an agronomist; Joseph Black, physicist and chemist; and James Hutton, the first modern geologist.
In Italy, parts of society also dramatically changed during the Enlightenment, with rulers such as Leopold II of Tuscany abolishing the death penalty in Tuscany. The significant reduction in the Church's power led to a period of great thought and invention, with scientists such as Alessandro Volta and Luigi Galvani making new discoveries and greatly contributing to science.
In Russia, the government began to actively encourage the proliferation of arts and sciences in the mid-18th century. This era produced the first Russian university, library, theatre, public museum, and independent press. Like other enlightened despots, Catherine the Great played a key role in fostering the arts, sciences, and education. She used her own interpretation of Enlightenment ideals, assisted by notable international experts such as Voltaire (by correspondence) and, in residence, world class scientists such as Leonhard Euler and Peter Simon Pallas. The national Enlightenment differed from its Western European counterpart in that it promoted further modernization of all aspects of Russian life and was concerned with attacking the institution of serfdom in Russia. The Russian enlightenment centered on the individual instead of societal enlightenment and encouraged the living of an enlightened life.

 

THE BEAUTIFUL: AESTHETICS IN THE ENLIGHTENMENT

Modern systematic philosophical aesthetics not only first emerges in the context of the Enlightenment, but also flowers brilliantly there. As Ernst Cassirer notes, the eighteenth century not only thinks of itself as the “century of philosophy”, but also as “the age of criticism,” where criticism is centrally (though not only) art and literary criticism  Philosophical aesthetics flourishes in the period because of its strong affinities with the tendencies of the age. Alexander Baumgarten, the German philosopher in the school of Christian Wolff, founds systematic aesthetics in the period, in part through giving it its name. “Aesthetics” is derived from the Greek word for “senses”, because for Baumgarten a science of the beautiful would be a science of the sensible, a science of sensible cognition. The Enlightenment in general re-discovers the value of the senses, not only in cognition, but in human lives in general, and so, given the intimate connection between beauty and human sensibility, the Enlightenment is naturally particularly interested in aesthetics. Also, the Enlightenment includes a general recovery and affirmation of the value of pleasure in human lives, against the past of Christian asceticism, and the flourishing of the arts, of the criticism of the arts and of the philosophical theorizing about beauty, promotes and is promoted by this recovery and affirmation. The Enlightenment also enthusiastically embraces the discovery and disclosure of rational order in nature, as manifest most clearly in the development of the new science. It seems to many theorists in the Enlightenment that the faculty of taste, the faculty by which we discern beauty, reveals to us some part of this order, a distinctive harmony, unities amidst variety. Thus, in the phenomenon of aesthetic pleasure, human sensibility discloses to us rational order, thus binding together two enthusiasms of the Enlightenment.

FRENCH CLASSICISM AND GERMAN RATIONALISM

In the early Enlightenment, especially in France, the emphasis is upon the discernment of an objective rational order, rather than upon the subject's sensual aesthetic pleasure. Though Descartes' philosophical system does not include a theory of taste or of beauty, his mathematical model of the physical universe inspires the aesthetics of French classicism. French classicism begins from the classical maxim that the beautiful is the true. Nicolas Boileau writes in his influential didactic poem, The Art of Poetry (1674), in which he lays down rules for good versification within different genres, that “Nothing is beautiful but the true, the true alone is lovable.” In the period the true is conceived of as an objective rational order. According to the classical conception of art that dominates in the period, art imitates nature, though not nature as given in disordered experience, but the ideal nature, the ideal in which we can discern and enjoy “unity in multiplicity.” In French classicism, aesthetics is very much under the influence of, and indeed modeled on, systematic, rigorous theoretical science of nature. Just as in Descartes' model of science, where knowledge of all particulars depends on prior knowledge of the principle from which the particulars are deduced, so also in the aesthetics of French classicism, the demand is for systematization under a single, universal principle. The subjection of artistic phenomena to universal rules and principles, the quest for system is expressed, for example, in the title of Charles Batteaux's main work, The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle (1746), as well as in Boileau's rules for good versification.
In Germany in the eighteenth century, Christian Wolff's systematic rationalist metaphysics forms the basis for much of the reflection on aesthetics, though sometimes as a set of doctrines to be argued against. For Wolff, the classical dictum that beauty is truth holds good;beauty is truth perceived through the feeling of pleasure. Wolff understands beauty to consist in the perfection in things, which he understands in turn to consist in a harmony or order of a manifold. We judge something beautiful through a feeling of pleasure when we sense in it this harmony or perfection. Beauty is, for Wolff, the sensitive cognition of perfection. Thus, for Wolff, beauty corresponds to objective features of the world, but judgments of beauty are relative to us also, insofar as they are based on the human faculty of sensibility.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Primary Literature

  • Bacon, F., 1620. The New Organon (Novum Organum), ed. by Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

  • Batteaux, C., 1746. Les beaux arts réduit à un même principe (The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle). Paris: Chez Durand.

  • Bayle, P., 1697 (2nd ed. 1702). Historical and Critical Dictionary, tr. by R. Popkin, Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1965.

  • Boileau, N., 1674. The Art of Poetry, tr. by William Soames, revised by J. Dryden, London: Printed by R. Bentley and S. Magnes, 1683.